• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用一种简单通用工具评估肺移植受者的生活质量

Assessment of quality of life in lung transplantation using a simple generic tool.

作者信息

Anyanwu A C, McGuire A, Rogers C A, Murday A J

机构信息

The UK Cardiothoracic Transplant Audit, Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK.

出版信息

Thorax. 2001 Mar;56(3):218-22. doi: 10.1136/thorax.56.3.218.

DOI:10.1136/thorax.56.3.218
PMID:11182015
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1758767/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The EuroQol is a generic questionnaire developed to provide a simple method for assigning utility values to health. This study examines the applicability of the EuroQol to the measurement of quality of life in single, bilateral, and heart-lung transplantation.

METHODS

A cross sectional study was performed in 87 patients awaiting lung transplantation and in 255 transplant recipients attending follow up clinics in four transplant units.

RESULTS

In the waiting list group 61% reported extreme problems in at least one of the five EuroQol quality of life domains compared with 20% single lung recipients, 4% bilateral lung recipients, and 2% heart-lung recipients at 3 or more years after transplantation. The mean utility value of patients on the waiting list was 0.31. In comparison, utility values for recipients 3 years after transplantation were 0.61 for single, 0.82 for bilateral, and 0.87 for heart-lung transplants. The utility scores and health profiles of bilateral and heart-lung recipients were consistently superior to those of single lung recipients. Problems in all five domains were more frequent in single lung recipients. Subjective assessment with a visual analogue scale showed a similar trend.

CONCLUSIONS

The EuroQol is a simple method of deriving a single utility value for quality of life and is responsive to changes after lung transplantation. It is worth considering as a means of monitoring quality of life after transplantation and as an index of quality of survival in research studies in solid organ transplantation. These data suggest that quality of life after transplantation of one lung is inferior to that after transplantation of two lungs.

摘要

背景

欧洲五维健康量表(EuroQol)是一种通用问卷,旨在提供一种为健康状况赋予效用值的简单方法。本研究探讨了欧洲五维健康量表在单肺移植、双肺移植和心肺移植生活质量测量中的适用性。

方法

对87例等待肺移植的患者以及在四个移植单位的随访门诊就诊的255例移植受者进行了横断面研究。

结果

在等待名单组中,61%的患者报告在欧洲五维健康量表的五个生活质量领域中至少有一个存在极端问题,相比之下,单肺移植受者在移植后3年及以上时这一比例为20%,双肺移植受者为4%,心肺移植受者为2%。等待名单上患者的平均效用值为0.31。相比之下,移植后3年单肺移植受者的效用值为0.61,双肺移植受者为0.82,心肺移植受者为0.87。双肺移植和心肺移植受者的效用得分和健康状况始终优于单肺移植受者。单肺移植受者在所有五个领域的问题都更频繁。视觉模拟量表的主观评估显示了类似的趋势。

结论

欧洲五维健康量表是一种为生活质量得出单一效用值的简单方法,并且对肺移植后的变化有反应。它值得作为监测移植后生活质量的一种手段以及实体器官移植研究中生存质量的一个指标来考虑。这些数据表明,单肺移植后的生活质量低于双肺移植后的生活质量。

相似文献

1
Assessment of quality of life in lung transplantation using a simple generic tool.使用一种简单通用工具评估肺移植受者的生活质量
Thorax. 2001 Mar;56(3):218-22. doi: 10.1136/thorax.56.3.218.
2
Longitudinal study of liver transplant recipients' quality of life as a function of their perception of general health: at waiting list and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-transplantation.肝移植受者生活质量随其对总体健康感知的纵向研究:在等待名单时以及移植后3个月、6个月和12个月。
Transplant Proc. 2013;45(10):3653-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.10.026.
3
Health-related quality of life following single or bilateral lung transplantation: a 7-year comparison to functional outcome.单肺或双肺移植后的健康相关生活质量:与功能结局的7年比较
Chest. 2005 Sep;128(3):1371-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.3.1371.
4
Olfactory performance before and after lung transplantation: quantitative assessment and impact on quality of life.肺移植前后的嗅觉表现:定量评估及其对生活质量的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010 Mar;29(3):265-72. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.07.016. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
5
Extracorporeal Life Support as a Bridge to Lung Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience With an Emphasis on Health-Related Quality of Life.体外生命支持作为肺移植的桥梁:单中心经验,重点关注与健康相关的生活质量。
Respir Care. 2017 May;62(5):588-594. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05300. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
6
Quality of Life Before and After Transplantation in Solid Organ Recipients Referred to the North Italy Transplant program (NITp): A Cross-sectional Study.转诊至意大利北部移植项目(NITp)的实体器官受者移植前后的生活质量:一项横断面研究。
Transplant Proc. 2019 Jul-Aug;51(6):1692-1698. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.02.034. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
7
Quality of life and utility in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Quality-of-life Study Group of the Master 2 Project in Pharmacoeconomics.非小细胞肺癌患者的生活质量与效用。药物经济学硕士2项目生活质量研究组。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(8):855-63. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119080-00007.
8
Measuring the quality of life before and after bilateral lung transplantation in patients with cystic fibrosis.测量囊性纤维化患者双侧肺移植前后的生活质量。
Chest. 1994 Mar;105(3):911-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.3.911.
9
Which patients should receive lung transplants?哪些患者应该接受肺移植?
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 1993 Aug;48(4):346-52.
10
Quality of life assessment in two consecutive years of patients in a waiting list for lung transplantation.对连续两年处于肺移植等候名单上的患者进行生活质量评估。
Transplant Proc. 2014 Nov;46(9):3060-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.07.022.

引用本文的文献

1
Health-Related Quality of Life After Pediatric Lung Transplantation.小儿肺移植后的健康相关生活质量
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2025 Jun;60(6):e71157. doi: 10.1002/ppul.71157.
2
Ivacaftor-tezacaftor-elexacaftor, tezacaftor-ivacaftor and lumacaftor-ivacaftor for treating cystic fibrosis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.依伐卡托-替扎卡托-艾列卡托、替扎卡托-依伐卡托和鲁玛卡托-依伐卡托治疗囊性纤维化:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(19):1-111. doi: 10.3310/CPLD8546.
3
Return-to-work in lung transplant recipients: an Australian perspective.肺移植受者的重返工作:澳大利亚视角
Intern Med J. 2025 Mar;55(3):415-425. doi: 10.1111/imj.16641. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
4
Single vs Double Lung Transplantation in Older Adults: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.老年人单肺移植与双肺移植:一项倾向匹配分析。
Chest. 2025 Feb;167(2):518-528. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.044. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
5
Tissue Injury Protection: The Other Face of Anticoagulant Treatments in the Context of Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury with a Focus on Transplantation.组织损伤保护:在缺血再灌注损伤的背景下,抗凝治疗的另一面,重点是移植。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Dec 14;24(24):17491. doi: 10.3390/ijms242417491.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Acthar Gel versus Standard of Care for the Treatment of Advanced Symptomatic Sarcoidosis.Acthar凝胶与标准治疗方案治疗晚期症状性结节病的成本效益
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Oct 17;15:739-752. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S428466. eCollection 2023.
7
A model-based economic analysis of the CFHealthHub intervention to support adherence to inhaled medications for people with cystic fibrosis in the UK.基于模型的经济分析:CFHealthHub 干预措施支持英国囊性纤维化患者使用吸入药物的依从性
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Jan 17;39(1):e6. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322003373.
8
The estimation of health state utility values in rare diseases: do the approaches in submissions for NICE technology appraisals reflect the existing literature? A scoping review.罕见病健康状态效用值评估:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所技术评估申请中的方法是否反映了现有文献? 范围综述。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Sep;24(7):1151-1216. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01541-y. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Nintedanib for Patients with Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease (PF-ILD).尼达尼布治疗进行性纤维化间质性肺疾病(PF-ILD)患者的成本效益
Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 Sep;6(5):647-656. doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00354-2. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
10
Cost-effectiveness of pirfenidone compared to all available strategies for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in France.在法国,与所有可用的特发性肺纤维化治疗策略相比,吡非尼酮的成本效益。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2019 Jun 24;7(1):1626171. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2019.1626171. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Variations in cardiac transplantation: comparisons between the United Kingdom and the United States.心脏移植的差异:英国与美国的比较
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1999 Apr;18(4):297-303. doi: 10.1016/s1053-2498(98)00051-5.
2
EuroQol: the current state of play.欧洲生活质量量表:当前进展情况
Health Policy. 1996 Jul;37(1):53-72. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6.
3
Does lung transplantation prolong life? A comparison of survival with and without transplantation.肺移植能延长生命吗?移植与未移植患者的生存情况比较。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1998 May;17(5):511-6.
4
The effect of lung transplantation on health-related quality of life: a longitudinal study.肺移植对健康相关生活质量的影响:一项纵向研究。
Chest. 1998 Feb;113(2):358-64. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.2.358.
5
Cost-effectiveness of lung transplantation in The Netherlands: a scenario analysis.荷兰肺移植的成本效益:一项情景分析。
Chest. 1998 Jan;113(1):124-30. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.1.124.
6
Effect of diagnosis on survival benefit of lung transplantation for end-stage lung disease.诊断对终末期肺病肺移植生存获益的影响。
Lancet. 1998 Jan 3;351(9095):24-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)06405-2.
7
Cost-utility of lung transplantation: a pilot study.肺移植的成本效用:一项试点研究。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1997 Nov;16(11):1129-34.
8
Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states.欧洲五维度健康量表健康状态的估值建模。
Med Care. 1997 Nov;35(11):1095-108. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002.
9
The cost of lung transplantation and the quality of life post-transplant.肺移植的成本及移植后的生活质量。
Clin Chest Med. 1997 Jun;18(2):391-403. doi: 10.1016/s0272-5231(05)70387-7.
10
Bilateral versus single lung transplantation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的双侧肺移植与单肺移植
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Mar;113(3):520-7; discussion 528. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70365-9.