• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

An in vitro study of the cytotoxicity of two root canal sealers.

作者信息

Cohen B I, Pagnillo M K, Musikant B L, Deutsch A S

机构信息

Dental Research, Essential Dental Laboratories, South Hackensacky, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Endod. 2000 Apr;26(4):228-9. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200004000-00008.

DOI:10.1097/00004770-200004000-00008
PMID:11199724
Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the cytotoxicity of two root canal sealing materials (AH26 and AH-Plus). This cytotoxicity test (agar diffusion test) was conducted based on the procedures described in the International Organization for Standardization. The biological reactivity of a mammalian monolayer, L929 mouse fibroblast cells, in response to the tested agents was determined. After the 48-h observation period, the cell cultures exposed to the test articles discs for AH26 and AH-Plus exhibited severe reactivity (grade 4). The positive control article exhibited moderate reactivity (grade 3). No signs of reactivity (grade 0) were noted for the negative control article or the negative control discs. The tested samples of AH26 and AH-Plus are considered cytotoxic and do not meet the requirement of the agar diffusion test. Similar cytotoxicity results have been found in the literature for AH26 and other root canal sealing cements.

摘要

相似文献

1
An in vitro study of the cytotoxicity of two root canal sealers.
J Endod. 2000 Apr;26(4):228-9. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200004000-00008.
2
Lactate dehydrogenase leakage of hepatocytes with AH26 and AH Plus sealer treatments.采用AH26和AH Plus封闭剂处理时肝细胞的乳酸脱氢酶泄漏情况。
J Endod. 2000 Sep;26(9):509-11. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200009000-00005.
3
In vitro cytotoxicity of a new epoxy resin root canal sealer.一种新型环氧树脂根管封闭剂的体外细胞毒性
J Endod. 2000 Aug;26(8):462-5. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200008000-00008.
4
Cytotoxic and mutagenic potencies of various root canal filling materials in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells in vitro.不同根管充填材料在真核细胞和原核细胞中的体外细胞毒性和致突变性。
J Endod. 1999 May;25(5):359-63. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81172-6.
5
Cytotoxicity of three resin-based root canal sealers: an in vitro evaluation.三种树脂类根管封闭剂的细胞毒性:一项体外评估
Endod Dent Traumatol. 1998 Aug;14(4):182-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1998.tb00834.x.
6
Cytotoxicity of endodontic materials.牙髓材料的细胞毒性。
J Endod. 1998 Feb;24(2):91-6. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80084-8.
7
A comparative evaluation of sealing ability of rootcanal sealers.根管封闭剂封闭能力的比较评估
Indian J Dent Res. 2002 Jan-Mar;13(1):31-6.
8
Cytotoxicity evaluation of six root canal sealers.
J Endod. 1995 Sep;21(9):446-8. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81525-6.
9
Examination of cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of AH26 and AH Plus sealers.AH26和AH Plus封闭剂的细胞毒性和致突变性检测。
Int Endod J. 2003 May;36(5):330-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00647.x.
10
[Cytotoxicity of root canal filling materials. 2. Preparation of calcium hydroxide (Calvital), paraformaldehyde (Triozinc paste), epoxy resin (AH 26), guaiacol formaldehyde resin (FR), and other root canal filling materials (N2, Nogenol)].[根管充填材料的细胞毒性。2. 氢氧化钙(Calvital)、多聚甲醛(Triozinc糊剂)、环氧树脂(AH 26)、愈创木酚甲醛树脂(FR)及其他根管充填材料(N2、Nogenol)的制备]
Shigaku. 1986 Feb;73(6):1619-56.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of biocompatibility of epoxy resin and bioceramic-based root canal sealers.环氧树脂和生物陶瓷基根管封闭剂的生物相容性比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Dec 2;28(12):673. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06071-w.
2
In Vitro Cytotoxicity and Mineralization Potential of an Endodontic Bioceramic Material.一种牙髓生物陶瓷材料的体外细胞毒性和矿化潜力
Eur J Dent. 2023 May;17(2):548-555. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1750778. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
3
A comprehensive in vitro comparison of the biological and physicochemical properties of bioactive root canal sealers.
一种生物活性根管封闭剂的生物学和理化性能的全面体外比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Oct;26(10):6209-6222. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04570-2. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
4
Antimicrobial effectiveness of root canal sealers against .根管封闭剂对……的抗菌效果
Biomater Investig Dent. 2022 May 10;9(1):47-51. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2022.2071719. eCollection 2022.
5
The Structural, Physical, and In Vitro Biological Performance of Freshly Mixed and Set Endodontic Sealers.新鲜混合和凝固的根管封闭剂的结构、物理和体外生物学性能。
Eur Endod J. 2021 Apr;6(1):98-109. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.36349. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
6
Calcium silicate-based root canal sealers: a literature review.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂:文献综述
Restor Dent Endod. 2020 Jun 9;45(3):e35. doi: 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e35. eCollection 2020 Aug.
7
Evaluation of the relationship between obturation length and presence of apical periodontitis by CBCT: an observational cross-sectional study.CBCT 评价根管充填长度与根尖周炎发生的关系:一项观察性横断面研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 May;23(5):2055-2060. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2623-7. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
8
Cytotoxicity of Two Experimental Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers.两种实验性环氧树脂类封闭剂的细胞毒性
Iran Endod J. 2018 Spring;13(2):257-262. doi: 10.22037/iej.v13i2.19530.
9
Physical Properties and Chemical Characterization of Two Experimental Epoxy Resin Root Canal Sealers.两种实验性环氧树脂根管封闭剂的物理性质和化学特性
Iran Endod J. 2017 Spring;12(2):149-156. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.30.
10
Cytotoxicity evaluation of a copaiba oil-based root canal sealer compared to three commonly used sealers in endodontics.与三种牙髓病学中常用的根管封闭剂相比,基于苦配巴油的根管封闭剂的细胞毒性评估。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015 Mar-Apr;12(2):121-6.