Suppr超能文献

环氧树脂和生物陶瓷基根管封闭剂的生物相容性比较。

Comparison of biocompatibility of epoxy resin and bioceramic-based root canal sealers.

作者信息

Uygun Ahmet Demirhan, Şen Serkan, Çelik Sefa

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, 03030, Turkey.

Department of Medical Laboratory Techniques, Atatürk Vocational School of Health Services, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Dec 2;28(12):673. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06071-w.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to compare the cytotoxicity of 2 bioceramic-based (Bioserra and AH Plus Bioceramic (Bio)) and 2 epoxy resin-based (Sealart and AH Plus) root canal sealers on the Saos-2 cell line.

METHODS

The cytotoxicity of the root canal sealers was determined using the MTT metabolic activity assay. The mRNA expression levels of Bcl-2, Beclin1, Cas-3, IL-6, LC3, MMP-9 and TNF-α genes were assessed by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and the expression of Beclin1 and LC3 proteins were assessed using western blot (WB) method. The canal sealers' total antioxidant status (TAS), total oxidant status (TOS), and oxidative stress index (OSI) were measured using photometric kits.

RESULTS

AH Plus Bio significantly increased metabolic activity compared to the 2 resin-containing sealers, but there was no difference with Bioserra. Sealart was clearly the most cytotoxic group. QRT-PCR analysis revealed that the mRNA expressions of Bcl-2, Beclin1, Cas-3, IL-6, LC3, and MMP-9 in the Bioserra group, Bcl-2, Cas-3, and IL-6 in the Sealart group, Beclin1, Cas-3, IL-6, and MMP-9 in the AH Plus group, and Bcl2 in the AH Plus Bio group were stimulated. The OSI results showed no significant difference between the root canal sealer groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the study, the best biocompatibility results in MTT, qRT-PCR, WB and OSI were in the AH Plus Bio group. Although Bioserra, the study's other bioceramic paste, was found to be biocompatible according to MTT and OSI measurements, it increased the expression of all genes in qRT-PCR except for TNF-α, and also increased LC3 protein levels in WB.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Since periradicular tissues can be directly affected by the materials used in root canal treatment, the sealers with high biocompatibility are being developed. In vitro studies examining the biocompatibility of newly produced root canal sealers are guiding for clinical success.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较两种生物陶瓷基(Bioserra和AH Plus生物陶瓷(Bio))和两种环氧树脂基(Sealart和AH Plus)根管封闭剂对Saos-2细胞系的细胞毒性。

方法

采用MTT代谢活性测定法测定根管封闭剂的细胞毒性。通过定量逆转录-聚合酶链反应(qRT-PCR)评估Bcl-2、Beclin1、Cas-3、IL-6、LC3、MMP-9和TNF-α基因的mRNA表达水平,并使用蛋白质免疫印迹(WB)法评估Beclin1和LC3蛋白的表达。使用光度法试剂盒测量根管封闭剂的总抗氧化状态(TAS)、总氧化状态(TOS)和氧化应激指数(OSI)。

结果

与两种含树脂的封闭剂相比,AH Plus Bio显著提高了代谢活性,但与Bioserra相比无差异。Sealart显然是细胞毒性最大的组。qRT-PCR分析显示,Bioserra组中Bcl-2、Beclin1、Cas-3、IL-6、LC3和MMP-9的mRNA表达,Sealart组中Bcl-2、Cas-3和IL-6的mRNA表达,AH Plus组中Beclin1、Cas-3、IL-6和MMP-9的mRNA表达,以及AH Plus Bio组中Bcl2的mRNA表达均受到刺激。OSI结果显示根管封闭剂组之间无显著差异。

结论

在本研究中,AH Plus Bio组在MTT、qRT-PCR、WB和OSI方面的生物相容性结果最佳。尽管根据MTT和OSI测量,本研究中的另一种生物陶瓷糊剂Bioserra具有生物相容性,但它在qRT-PCR中增加了除TNF-α之外所有基因的表达,并且在WB中也增加了LC3蛋白水平。

临床意义

由于根尖周组织会直接受到根管治疗中所用材料的影响,因此正在研发具有高生物相容性的封闭剂。检测新生产的根管封闭剂生物相容性的体外研究对临床成功具有指导意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验