Holopigian K, Seiple W, Greenstein V C, Hood D C, Carr R E
Department of Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, BEL 5N15, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Mar;42(3):779-88.
To compare local cone and rod system function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) using electrophysiological and psychophysical techniques.
Cone-mediated multifocal electroretinograms (M-ERGs), cone system threshold visual fields, rod-mediated M-ERGs, and rod system threshold visual fields were measured in seven patients with RP.
All the patients had normal cone system visual field thresholds and normal cone-mediated M-ERG implicit times within the central 5 degrees. Both cone-mediated responses were abnormal at some peripheral retinal locations. There were significant correlations among cone system amplitude, timing, and visual field loss. All the patients had some retinal areas where the rod-mediated M-ERG amplitudes were not measurable. In areas where they were measurable, these rod-mediated M-ERG responses were often within normal limits for amplitude and timing. In contrast to the cone system data, there were no significant relationships between rod-mediated M-ERG measures and rod system threshold elevations. The cone and rod system psychophysical thresholds showed regional correspondence; the amplitude-scale and time-scale measures of the M-ERG did not.
The results indicate that there was better local correspondence between psychophysical and electrophysiological measures in the cone system than in the rod system in patients with RP. In addition, the psychophysical measures of cone and rod system function showed better correspondence than did the electrophysiological measures.
使用电生理和心理物理学技术比较视网膜色素变性(RP)患者的局部视锥和视杆系统功能。
对7例RP患者测量视锥介导的多焦视网膜电图(M-ERG)、视锥系统阈值视野、视杆介导的M-ERG和视杆系统阈值视野。
所有患者在中央5度范围内视锥系统视野阈值正常,视锥介导的M-ERG隐含时间正常。在一些周边视网膜位置,两种视锥介导的反应均异常。视锥系统振幅、时间和视野缺损之间存在显著相关性。所有患者都有一些视网膜区域,视杆介导的M-ERG振幅无法测量。在可测量的区域,这些视杆介导的M-ERG反应在振幅和时间方面通常在正常范围内。与视锥系统数据相反,视杆介导的M-ERG测量与视杆系统阈值升高之间没有显著关系。视锥和视杆系统心理物理学阈值显示出区域对应关系;M-ERG的振幅尺度和时间尺度测量则不然。
结果表明,RP患者视锥系统中,心理物理学和电生理测量之间的局部对应性比视杆系统更好。此外,视锥和视杆系统功能的心理物理学测量比电生理测量显示出更好的对应性。