Frick P J, Ellis M
Department of Psychology, University of New Orleans, Louisiana 70148, USA.
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 1999 Sep;2(3):149-68. doi: 10.1023/a:1021803005547.
There has been growing consensus that children with conduct disorder (CD) constitute a very heterogeneous group containing children who vary substantially on the development, course, and causes of the disorder. While many have recognized the importance of this heterogeneity for developing better causal theories and for developing more effective treatments, there has been little consensus as to the best way to subtype children with CD. In this paper, we review a number of approaches to subtyping, each with some evidence for its validity for certain purposes. We focus on two recent approaches that have great potential for integrating past subtyping approaches and for advancing causal theory. The first approach is the division of children with CD into those with a childhood onset to their severe antisocial behavior and those with an adolescent onset to their behavior. The second approach is to designate children within the childhood-onset group who show callous and unemotional traits, which is analogous to adult conceptualizations of psychopathy. Both approaches help designate children who many show different causal processes underlying their severe aggressive and antisocial behavior, and who may warrant different approaches to treatment.
越来越多的人达成共识,即患有品行障碍(CD)的儿童构成了一个非常异质的群体,其中包含在该障碍的发展、病程和病因方面差异很大的儿童。虽然许多人已经认识到这种异质性对于发展更好的因果理论和开发更有效的治疗方法的重要性,但对于对患有CD的儿童进行亚型划分的最佳方法却几乎没有达成共识。在本文中,我们回顾了一些亚型划分方法,每种方法都有一定证据表明其在某些目的上的有效性。我们重点关注两种最近的方法,它们在整合过去的亚型划分方法和推进因果理论方面具有巨大潜力。第一种方法是将患有CD的儿童分为严重反社会行为始于童年期的儿童和始于青少年期的儿童。第二种方法是在始于童年期的儿童群体中指定表现出冷酷无情特质的儿童,这类似于成人对精神病态的概念化。这两种方法都有助于确定那些在其严重攻击性行为和反社会行为背后可能表现出不同因果过程的儿童,以及那些可能需要不同治疗方法的儿童。