• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《贝克抑郁量表》西班牙语翻译中的项目功能差异

Differential item functioning in a Spanish translation of the Beck Depression Inventory.

作者信息

Azocar F, Areán P, Miranda J, Muñoz R F

机构信息

University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 2001 Mar;57(3):355-65. doi: 10.1002/jclp.1017.

DOI:10.1002/jclp.1017
PMID:11241365
Abstract

Brief and culturally compatible measures of depression are necessary, yet most depression scales are translated without regard for cultural biases. In this study, 292 medical outpatients completed an English or a Spanish-translated and back-translated version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The BDI items were analyzed for bias between Spanish and English-speaking patients to determine the equivalence of the scale. A Differential Item Function (DIF) using a Mantel Haenszel Approach for Ordered Response Categories was used to analyze how likely subjects in the two ethnic groups were to endorse each response category. The results suggest that regardless of level of depression, Latinos are more likely to endorse items reflecting tearfulness and punishment, and less likely to endorse inability to work. Cultural interpretations and recommendations for use of the BDI are discussed.

摘要

简短且文化兼容的抑郁测量方法很有必要,但大多数抑郁量表在翻译时并未考虑文化偏差。在本研究中,292名门诊患者完成了贝克抑郁量表(BDI)的英文或西班牙语翻译及回译版本。对BDI项目进行分析,以确定西班牙语和英语患者之间的偏差,从而确定该量表的等效性。采用曼特尔 - 亨塞尔有序反应类别方法进行差异项目功能(DIF)分析,以研究两个种族群体的受试者认可每个反应类别的可能性。结果表明,无论抑郁程度如何,拉丁裔更有可能认可反映流泪和惩罚的项目,而不太可能认可无法工作的项目。文中还讨论了BDI的文化解读及使用建议。

相似文献

1
Differential item functioning in a Spanish translation of the Beck Depression Inventory.《贝克抑郁量表》西班牙语翻译中的项目功能差异
J Clin Psychol. 2001 Mar;57(3):355-65. doi: 10.1002/jclp.1017.
2
Psychometric properties of the Spanish Beck Depression Inventory-II in a medical sample.西班牙版贝克抑郁量表第二版在一个医学样本中的心理测量学特性。
Psychol Assess. 2003 Dec;15(4):569-77. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.569.
3
Using the brief symptom inventory to profile monolingual Spanish-speaking psychiatric outpatients.使用简明症状量表对说西班牙语的单语精神科门诊患者进行概况分析。
J Clin Psychol. 1994 Sep;50(5):723-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199409)50:5<723::aid-jclp2270500509>3.0.co;2-m.
4
Comparison of the Chinese Depression Inventory and the Chinese version of the Beck Depression Inventory.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1991 Dec;84(6):531-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb03189.x.
5
Psychometric properties of the Spanish-language child depression inventory with Hispanic children who are secondary victims of domestic violence.针对遭受家庭暴力的西班牙裔儿童这一二级受害者群体,西班牙语儿童抑郁量表的心理测量特性。
Adolescence. 2009 Spring;44(173):133-48.
6
[Reliability and validity of the Revised Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). Results from German samples].[修订版贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)的信度和效度。来自德国样本的结果]
Nervenarzt. 2007 Jun;78(6):651-6. doi: 10.1007/s00115-006-2098-7.
7
A psychometric comparison of the Beck Depression Inventory-II in English and Spanish.贝克抑郁量表第二版英文和西班牙文版本的心理测量学比较。
Psychol Assess. 2005 Dec;17(4):481-5. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.481.
8
Identification of Beck Depression Inventory items related to multiple sclerosis.
J Behav Med. 1997 Aug;20(4):407-14. doi: 10.1023/a:1025573315492.
9
Cross-cultural equivalence of the Beck Depression Inventory: a five-country analysis from the ODIN study.贝克抑郁量表的跨文化等效性:来自奥丁研究的五国分析。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.021. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
10
Enhancing rigour in the validation of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs): bridging linguistic and psychometric testing.提高患者报告结局测量(PROMs)验证的严谨性:弥合语言和心理计量测试之间的差距。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Jun 8;10:64. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-64.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of PozQoL scale in Turkish population living with HIV: a cross-cultural adaptation study.土耳其 HIV 感染者 PozQoL 量表的验证:一项跨文化调适研究。
PeerJ. 2024 Aug 21;12:e17873. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17873. eCollection 2024.
2
What Do Patients Want in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder? Taiwan's TAILOR Survey.在重度抑郁症治疗中患者想要什么?台湾的TAILOR调查。
Neurol Ther. 2023 Apr;12(Suppl 1):21-29. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00471-y. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
3
Long-term consistency of clinical sensory testing measures for pain assessment.
用于疼痛评估的临床感觉测试方法的长期一致性
Korean J Pain. 2023 Apr 1;36(2):173-183. doi: 10.3344/kjp.23011.
4
Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short form across ten countries: the application of Bayesian approximate measurement invariance.跨文化十国生活质量享受与满意度问卷短式量表的测量不变性:贝叶斯近似测量不变性的应用。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Jun 24;10(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00864-y.
5
Development and validation of 21-item outcome inventory (OI-21).21项结果量表(OI-21)的开发与验证
Heliyon. 2022 Jun 7;8(6):e09682. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09682. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Screening for depression with the PHQ-9 in young adults affected by HIV.使用 PHQ-9 对感染 HIV 的年轻成年人进行抑郁筛查。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jan 15;297:276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.037. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
7
¡No me duele cuando me deprimo!: An Examination of Ethnic Differences in Depression Symptoms Among Latinx and Non-Latinx Primary Care Patients.当我感到沮丧时,我并不感到痛苦!:拉丁裔和非拉丁裔初级保健患者中抑郁症状的种族差异研究。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2021 Oct;23(5):917-925. doi: 10.1007/s10903-021-01238-z. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
8
Differential item functioning of the Beck Anxiety Inventory in a rural, multi-ethnic cohort.贝克焦虑量表在农村多民族队列中的差异项目功能。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Oct 1;293:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
9
Clinical Applications of Measurement Invariance.测量不变性的临床应用
J Pers Assess. 2020 Sep-Oct;102(5):727-729. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1793766. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
10
When Does Differential Item Functioning Matter for Screening? A Method for Empirical Evaluation.差异项目功能在筛查中何时重要?一种实证评估方法。
Assessment. 2021 Mar;28(2):446-456. doi: 10.1177/1073191120913618. Epub 2020 Apr 4.