Gibson B
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Chest. 2001 Mar;119(3):940-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.3.940.
Although long-term ventilation (LTV) has been shown to extend the lives of individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), initiating LTV is still considered controversial. The purpose of the study was to describe the LTV-related attitudes and practices of Canadian physicians who follow up patients with DMD.
The study consisted of a mail questionnaire supplemented by face-to-face interviews.
Forty-five physicians who follow up patients with DMD through Canadian neuromuscular clinics.
A mail questionnaire of 66 closed-ended questions related to practice and attitudes was completed by all respondents. Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted with six volunteer physicians, and were audiotaped and transcribed.
The results indicated that 25.0% of physicians do not discuss LTV with all of their DMD patients. The most frequently cited reason for advising against LTV was poor patient quality of life (52.6%). Three themes emerged from the qualitative data: mentioning and discussing LTV are discrete events with different purposes, nighttime and full-time LTV decisions are approached differently, and physicians modify their discussions to influence outcome.
The study demonstrated considerable agreement among the physicians regarding disclosure practices. Concerns are raised by the number of physicians who do not disclose to all patients and families and the role of quality-of-life judgments in decision making. It is suggested that because of their subjective nature, quality-of-life judgments should not be made without the participation of the patient and family, and that an initial disclosure is the minimum requirement of informed consent/decision making.
尽管长期通气(LTV)已被证明可延长杜氏肌营养不良症(DMD)患者的生命,但启动LTV仍存在争议。本研究的目的是描述随访DMD患者的加拿大医生与LTV相关的态度和做法。
本研究包括一份邮寄问卷,并辅以面对面访谈。
通过加拿大神经肌肉诊所随访DMD患者的45名医生。
所有受访者均完成了一份包含66个与实践和态度相关的封闭式问题的邮寄问卷。对6名志愿医生进行了定性半结构化访谈,并进行了录音和转录。
结果表明,25.0%的医生没有与他们所有的DMD患者讨论LTV。反对LTV的最常见原因是患者生活质量差(52.6%)。定性数据中出现了三个主题:提及和讨论LTV是具有不同目的的离散事件,夜间和全日制LTV决策的处理方式不同,医生会调整他们的讨论以影响结果。
该研究表明医生们在披露做法上有相当大的共识。未向所有患者和家属披露信息的医生数量以及生活质量判断在决策中的作用令人担忧。建议由于生活质量判断具有主观性,不应在患者和家属未参与的情况下做出,并且初始披露是知情同意/决策的最低要求。