• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Rationalising chances of success in intersectoral health policy making.合理规划跨部门卫生政策制定的成功几率。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 May;55(5):342-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.5.342.
2
Elusive implementation: an ethnographic study of intersectoral policymaking for health.难以捉摸的实施:一项关于卫生领域跨部门政策制定的人种志研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 30;18(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2864-9.
3
Towards health in all policies for childhood obesity prevention.迈向在所有政策中预防儿童肥胖的健康目标。
J Obes. 2013;2013:632540. doi: 10.1155/2013/632540. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
4
Making health policy management intersectoral: issues of information analysis and use in less developed countries.使卫生政策管理具有跨部门性:欠发达国家的信息分析与利用问题
Soc Sci Med. 1989;29(4):503-14. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90196-2.
5
Health impact assessment: assessing opportunities and barriers to intersectoral health improvement in an expanded European Union.健康影响评估:评估扩大后的欧盟跨部门改善健康的机遇与障碍。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 May;59(5):356-60. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.024026.
6
Glossary for the implementation of Health in All Policies (HiAP).卫生政策全纳入实施术语表。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Dec 1;67(12):1068-72. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202731. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
7
Intersectoral action for health: the experience of a Danish municipality.卫生领域的跨部门行动:丹麦一个市镇的经验
Scand J Public Health. 2014 Nov;42(7):649-57. doi: 10.1177/1403494814544397. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
8
Intersectoriality in Danish municipalities: corrupting the social determinants of health?丹麦市政当局的部门间合作:是否在破坏健康的社会决定因素?
Health Promot Int. 2017 Oct 1;32(5):881-890. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw020.
9
Intersectoral action on SDH and equity in Australian health policy.澳大利亚卫生政策中关于社会决定因素健康及公平性的跨部门行动。
Health Promot Int. 2017 Dec 1;32(6):953-963. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw035.
10
Health policy-making in central and eastern Europe: lessons from the inaction on injuries?中东欧的卫生政策制定:从对伤害问题的不作为中吸取的教训?
Health Policy Plan. 2000 Sep;15(3):263-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/15.3.263.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanisms of Intersectoral Collaboration in the Health System: A Scoping Review.卫生系统跨部门合作机制:一项范围综述
Iran J Public Health. 2023 Nov;52(11):2299-2312. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i11.14030.
2
Identifying health policy and systems research priorities on multisectoral collaboration for health in low-income and middle-income countries.确定低收入和中等收入国家卫生领域多部门合作的卫生政策与系统研究重点。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Oct 10;3(Suppl 4):e000970. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000970. eCollection 2018.
3
Glossary for the implementation of Health in All Policies (HiAP).卫生政策全纳入实施术语表。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Dec 1;67(12):1068-72. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202731. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
4
Area deprivation and child psychosocial problems--a national cross-sectional study among school-aged children.地区贫困与儿童心理社会问题——一项针对学龄儿童的全国性横断面研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005 Jan;40(1):18-23. doi: 10.1007/s00127-005-0850-0.
5
What new knowledge would help policymakers better balance investments for optimal health outcomes?哪些新知识能帮助政策制定者更好地平衡投资以实现最佳健康结果?
Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec;38(6 Pt 2):1923-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00209.x.
6
Neighbourhood socioeconomic context and self reported health and smoking: a secondary analysis of data on seven cities.社区社会经济背景与自我报告的健康及吸烟情况:对七个城市数据的二次分析
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Dec;56(12):935-42. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.12.935.

本文引用的文献

1
Targets as a tool in health policy. Part II: Guidelines for application.目标作为卫生政策工具。第二部分:应用指南。
Health Policy. 2000 Aug;53(1):13-23. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00082-8.
2
Practical partnerships for health and local authorities.卫生部门与地方当局的切实合作关系。
BMJ. 2000 Jun 24;320(7251):1723-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1723.
3
Health impact assessment.健康影响评估
BMJ. 2000 May 20;320(7246):1395-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7246.1395.
4
Health impact assessment.
Health Policy Plan. 1999 Jun;14(2):198-203. doi: 10.1093/heapol/14.2.198.
5
Health impact assessment--theory into practice.健康影响评估——从理论到实践
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Nov;52(11):704-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.11.704.
6
Priorities and strategies for promoting community-based prevention policies.促进基于社区的预防政策的优先事项和策略。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1998 May;4(3):14-28. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199805000-00003.
7
Evaluation of indicated preventive intervention (secondary prevention) mental health programs for children and adolescents.针对儿童和青少年的指定预防性干预(二级预防)心理健康项目评估。
Am J Community Psychol. 1998 Oct;26(5):775-802. doi: 10.1023/a:1022162015815.
8
Primary prevention mental health programs for children and adolescents: a meta-analytic review.针对儿童和青少年的心理健康初级预防项目:一项荟萃分析综述
Am J Community Psychol. 1997 Apr;25(2):115-52. doi: 10.1023/a:1024654026646.
9
Setting the stage for health impact assessment.为健康影响评估奠定基础。
J Public Health Policy. 1997;18(1):67-79.
10
Timeless epidemiology or history cannot be ignored.永恒的流行病学或历史不容忽视。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Apr;45(4):365-72. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90037-n.

合理规划跨部门卫生政策制定的成功几率。

Rationalising chances of success in intersectoral health policy making.

作者信息

van Herten L M, Reijneveld S A, Gunning-Schepers L J

机构信息

TNO Prevention and Health, PO Box 2215, 2301 CE Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 May;55(5):342-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.5.342.

DOI:10.1136/jech.55.5.342
PMID:11297657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1731893/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

It is generally accepted that a wide range of factors determine the health of a population, many of which are beyond the remit of the Ministry of Health. The aim of intersectoral health policy is to influence these factors. Success depends on a multi-stage process. This paper aims to provide support for the first stage of this process in the form of a quick scan for appraising the feasibility of intersectoral health policy.

DESIGN

The content of the quick scan for intersectoral health policy was derived from a literature review. To determine the usefulness of this quick scan, the study looked at two examples in the policy sectors of education and safety.

MAIN RESULTS

The quick scan distinguishes between three factors: (1) the availability of evidence, (2) the degree of support, and (3) the availability of tools for implementation. The quick scan made it possible to review the two policy sectors systematically in a relatively short time and to obtain sufficient information for priority setting in intersectoral health policy. The examples in this paper suggest that intersectoral health policy for community safety is more feasible than intersectoral policy for psychosocial problems in secondary education. However, specific information is required for a more precise assessment of feasibility.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many ways of improving health through intersectoral health policy. The proposed quick scan may provide systematic support for setting priorities before developing policies of this kind.

摘要

目的

人们普遍认为,多种因素决定着人口健康状况,其中许多因素超出了卫生部的职权范围。部门间卫生政策的目标是对这些因素产生影响。成功取决于一个多阶段过程。本文旨在通过快速审查为这一过程的第一阶段提供支持,以评估部门间卫生政策的可行性。

设计

部门间卫生政策快速审查的内容源自文献综述。为确定该快速审查的实用性,本研究考察了教育和安全政策领域的两个实例。

主要结果

快速审查区分了三个因素:(1)证据的可得性,(2)支持程度,以及(3)实施工具的可得性。快速审查使得在相对较短的时间内系统地审查这两个政策领域并获取足够信息以确定部门间卫生政策的优先事项成为可能。本文中的实例表明,社区安全的部门间卫生政策比中等教育中心理社会问题的部门间政策更具可行性。然而,需要具体信息才能更精确地评估可行性。

结论

通过部门间卫生政策改善健康有多种方式。提议的快速审查可能为制定此类政策之前确定优先事项提供系统支持。