Goldin S, Levin L, Persson L A, Hägglof B
Department of Clinical Sciences, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Umeå University, Sweden.
Med Confl Surviv. 2001 Jan-Mar;17(1):25-47. doi: 10.1080/13623690108409553.
While standardized questionnaires produce counts of isolated events, a semi-structured interview derives a story, a complex narrative in time and place. Ninety Bosnian refugee children and adolescents (ages 1-20), resettled in Sweden, were assessed in a semi-structured clinical interview designed to identify and offer support to children at risk. A family-child account of traumatic exposure was analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. Type-stories or clusters of experience were identified for three distinct periods: prior to war, during war, and after war in exile. The extent of trauma-stress exposure during each of these periods proved unrelated. Pre-war experience presented as preponderantly good and safe. Differences in child exposure during war and exile could be understood in relation to identifiable socio-demographic factors; particularly ethnic background, social class, child age and family size. Further, the stories derived cast light on the equity of Swedish refugee reception, exposing both egalitarian and discriminatory tendencies.
标准化问卷统计的是孤立事件的数量,而半结构化访谈则能梳理出一个故事,一个关于时间和地点的复杂叙述。对90名在瑞典重新定居的波斯尼亚难民儿童和青少年(年龄在1至20岁之间)进行了半结构化临床访谈评估,旨在识别有风险的儿童并为其提供支持。对家庭和儿童关于创伤经历的描述进行了定量和定性分析。确定了三个不同时期的类型故事或经历集群:战前、战时和流亡后。结果表明,这些时期中每个时期的创伤应激暴露程度并无关联。战前经历大多呈现出美好和安全的特点。战时和流亡期间儿童所经历的差异可以通过可识别的社会人口因素来理解,特别是种族背景、社会阶层、儿童年龄和家庭规模。此外,所得到的故事揭示了瑞典难民接纳情况的公平性,既展现了平等主义倾向,也暴露了歧视性倾向。