Steffens M C, Plewe I
Universität Trier.
Z Exp Psychol. 2001;48(2):123-34. doi: 10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.123.
The introduction of the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998) has stimulated numerous research activities. The IAT is supposed to measure the degree of association between concepts. Instances have to be assigned to these concepts by pressing appropriate keys as quickly as possible. The reaction time difference between certain conditions, termed the IAT effect, is used as an indicator of the degree of the concepts' association. We tested the hypothesis that the degree of association between one concept (or category) and the instances of the other presented concept also influences reaction times. In our experiment, the instances in the target categories, male and female names, were kept constant. The adjectives in the evaluative categories were manipulated: Either the pleasant adjectives were female-associated and the unpleasant adjectives were male-associated, or vice versa. These stereotypic associations were indeed found to exert a substantial influence on the size of the IAT effect. This finding casts doubt on the assumption that the IAT effect may be interpreted as a pure measure of the degree of association between concepts.
内隐联想测验(IAT;格林沃尔德、麦吉和施瓦茨,1998年)的引入激发了众多研究活动。IAT旨在测量概念之间的关联程度。必须通过尽快按下相应按键将实例分配给这些概念。某些条件之间的反应时差异,即IAT效应,被用作概念关联程度的指标。我们检验了这样一个假设,即一个概念(或类别)与另一个呈现概念的实例之间的关联程度也会影响反应时。在我们的实验中,目标类别(男性和女性名字)中的实例保持不变。对评价类别中的形容词进行了操控:要么愉快的形容词与女性相关,不愉快的形容词与男性相关,要么反之。结果发现,这些刻板印象关联确实对IAT效应的大小产生了实质性影响。这一发现使人怀疑IAT效应可被解释为概念之间关联程度的纯粹度量这一假设。