• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童焦点小组中的方法学考量

Methodological considerations in children's focus groups.

作者信息

Kennedy C, Kools S, Krueger R

机构信息

Department of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0606, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Res. 2001 May-Jun;50(3):184-7. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200105000-00010.

DOI:10.1097/00006199-200105000-00010
PMID:11393641
Abstract

Focus groups are a well-known qualitative approach to gathering data in health science research. The literature on focus groups, however, primarily discusses adults as subjects. Unfortunately, the scant reports of studies using children as participants in focus groups have not described their methods in detail. This article discusses the use of children (age 6-12) in focus groups, and highlights methodological considerations in this approach, with particular attention to the integration of developmental principles. Focus groups with children can capture their perspectives, original ideas, and insights, which are often neglected in more traditional pediatric research. Focus groups can also serve as an innovative approach to understanding children's experiences from a developmental perspective. Further, focus groups free children and investigator from the data-gathering limitations placed by literacy/reading levels that plague quantitative methods using self-report. By using relatively homogeneous groups, common cultural, emotional, and cognitive processes and responses are revealed that normally would not come to light in structured data collection. Focus groups offer a rich, interactive and developmentally effective approach to planning, content and evaluation in research with children.

摘要

焦点小组是健康科学研究中一种广为人知的收集数据的定性方法。然而,关于焦点小组的文献主要讨论的是以成年人作为研究对象。遗憾的是,仅有少量关于将儿童作为焦点小组参与者的研究报告,且并未详细描述其方法。本文讨论了在焦点小组中使用6至12岁儿童的情况,并强调了这种方法在方法论上的考量,尤其关注发展原则的整合。与儿童进行焦点小组讨论能够获取他们的观点、原创想法和见解,而这些在更为传统的儿科研究中常常被忽视。焦点小组还可以作为一种创新方法,从发展的角度理解儿童的经历。此外,焦点小组使儿童和研究者摆脱了困扰使用自我报告的定量方法的数据收集限制,即识字/阅读水平的限制。通过使用相对同质的小组,能够揭示出通常在结构化数据收集中不会显现的共同文化、情感和认知过程及反应。焦点小组为针对儿童的研究中的规划、内容和评估提供了一种丰富、互动且在发展方面有效的方法。

相似文献

1
Methodological considerations in children's focus groups.儿童焦点小组中的方法学考量
Nurs Res. 2001 May-Jun;50(3):184-7. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200105000-00010.
2
Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups.文献综述:针对文化和语言背景各异群体开展焦点小组研究的注意事项
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1000-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x.
3
Caregivers' reading practices to promote literacy in a South African children's home: Experiences and perceptions.南非儿童之家照顾者促进识字的阅读实践:经验与看法。
S Afr J Commun Disord. 2018 Jun 28;65(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v65i1.559.
4
Symptom experiences of children and adolescents with cancer.患癌儿童和青少年的症状体验。
Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2003;21:123-49.
5
Adopting the qualitative paradigm to understanding children's perspectives of illness: barrier or facilitator?采用质性范式来理解儿童对疾病的看法:障碍还是促进因素?
J Pediatr Nurs. 2001 Jun;16(3):149-61. doi: 10.1053/jpdn.2001.24178.
6
Literacy promotion: an essential component of primary care pediatric practice.扫盲促进:初级保健儿科实践的重要组成部分。
Pediatrics. 2014 Aug;134(2):404-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1384. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
7
Developmentally-based AIDS/HIV education.基于发展阶段的艾滋病/艾滋病毒教育。
J Sch Health. 1990 Aug;60(6):256-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1990.tb05928.x.
8
Defining Taiwanese children's health literacy abilities from a health promotion perspective.从健康促进的角度界定台湾儿童的健康素养能力。
Glob Health Promot. 2017 Dec;24(4):69-80. doi: 10.1177/1757975915626114. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
9
How do foster carers manage the oral health of children in foster care? A qualitative study.寄养照顾者如何管理寄养儿童的口腔健康?一项定性研究。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;45(6):529-537. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12316. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
10
Evaluating health-related quality-of-life studies in paediatric populations: some conceptual, methodological and developmental considerations and recent applications.评估儿科人群中与健康相关的生活质量研究:一些概念、方法和发展方面的考量及近期应用
Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(7):659-85. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523070-00003.

引用本文的文献

1
New Zealand school children's perspectives on influenza: listening to young voices in respiratory health.新西兰学童对流感的看法:倾听呼吸健康领域的年轻声音。
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Oct 2;25(1):740. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-06130-5.
2
A Multi-Site Refinement Study of , an Intervention to Support Parents Confronted with Childhood Cancer.一项关于支持面临儿童癌症的父母的干预措施——“ ”的多地点优化研究。 (注:原文中“of”后面似乎缺失了具体内容)
Curr Oncol. 2025 Apr 26;32(5):253. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32050253.
3
Exploring the feasibility of using discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit preferences among children and adolescents: protocol for a convergent parallel mixed methods study.
探索使用离散选择实验(DCE)来引出儿童和青少年偏好的可行性:一项收敛平行混合方法研究的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 8;15(4):e097598. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097598.
4
Initiating and Sustaining GSAs Across the District as Part of a Vision for Equity: A Case Study in Chicago Public Schools.作为公平愿景的一部分,在整个学区发起并维持性别与性向联盟:芝加哥公立学校的一个案例研究
J Sch Health. 2024 Dec;94(12):1153-1163. doi: 10.1111/josh.13540. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
5
Factors that influence food choices in secondary school canteens: a qualitative study of pupil and staff perspectives.影响中学食堂食物选择的因素:学生和工作人员观点的定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 14;11:1227075. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1227075. eCollection 2023.
6
Institutional role conflict in the digital age: The case of diabetes management at school.数字时代的机构角色冲突:以学校糖尿病管理为例。
SSM Qual Res Health. 2023 Jun;3. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100215. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
7
3D-Printing Physical Activity in Youth: An Autotopographical Approach to Behaviour Change.3D 打印在青少年中的体力活动:一种行为改变的自绘地图方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 14;20(2):1530. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021530.
8
The influence of Chile's food labeling and advertising law and other factors on dietary and physical activity behavior of elementary students in a peripheral region: a qualitative study.智利食品标签与广告法及其他因素对某边缘地区小学生饮食与身体活动行为的影响:一项定性研究
BMC Nutr. 2023 Jan 11;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40795-023-00671-7.
9
The Acute Effects of Cognitively Demanding Physical Activity on Inhibitory and Affective Responses in Children: An Online-Based Mixed Methods Approach.认知要求较高的体育活动对儿童抑制性和情感反应的急性影响:基于网络的混合方法研究。
Children (Basel). 2022 Dec 2;9(12):1896. doi: 10.3390/children9121896.
10
Incorporating movement breaks into primary school classrooms; a mixed methods approach to explore the perceptions of pupils, staff and governors.将课间休息融入小学课堂;一种混合方法来探索学生、教职员工和校董会的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 24;22(1):2172. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14551-5.