van Bommel M J, Numans M E, de Wit N J, Stalman W A
Julius Centre for General Practice and Patient Oriented Research, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, P O Box 85060, 3508 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Postgrad Med J. 2001 Aug;77(910):514-8. doi: 10.1136/pmj.77.910.514.
Dyspepsia usually presents first in primary care. There are many reasons for referral including urgent problems (for example, haematemesis and melaena), treatment failure, or to exclude serious pathology. Referral will change the population characteristics of primary and secondary care dyspeptics. Many of the guidelines for primary care dyspepsia, however, are based on secondary care research on these referred patients. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of dyspepsia in general practice, the characteristics of patients presenting with dyspepsia in primary care, and the clinical and non-clinical determinants of referral in these patients.
Cross sectional survey of the consultation records of patients presenting with dyspepsia in primary care during a one year period.
Dyspeptic patients who consulted their general practitioner (GP) in 1997 were selected on the basis of International Classification of Primary Care codes using a computer search among 20 sentinel practices affiliated with the Utrecht Network of General Practitioners. Cross tables and logistic regression analysis were carried out to reveal patient characteristics and determinants of referral.
The prevalence of dyspepsia presenting in primary care in 1997 was 3.4% (1740/48958). These patients were usually not referred during the first consultation. Men, elderly patients, and patients with a previous history of dyspepsia were referred to secondary care more frequently than other dyspeptic patients. Patients diagnosed with both irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia were at risk of being referred most.
Dyspepsia is a frequently occurring complaint in primary care and patients are usually treated by their GP. Besides clinically relevant reasons for referral, dyspeptic patients with irritable bowel syndrome seem to be more "at risk" of being referred to secondary care than other dyspeptic patients. The differences between primary and secondary care dyspeptic patients should be taken into account when interpreting research for guideline purposes. Further research is needed to clarify the background of the relation between irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia and its influence on referral.
消化不良通常首先在基层医疗中出现。转诊的原因有很多,包括紧急问题(如呕血和黑便)、治疗失败或排除严重病变。转诊会改变基层和二级医疗中消化不良患者的人群特征。然而,许多基层医疗消化不良的指南是基于对这些转诊患者的二级医疗研究制定的。本研究的目的是描述全科医疗中消化不良的患病率、基层医疗中出现消化不良患者的特征,以及这些患者转诊的临床和非临床决定因素。
对一年内基层医疗中出现消化不良患者的会诊记录进行横断面调查。
根据国际基层医疗分类编码,通过计算机搜索,从乌得勒支全科医生网络附属的20家哨点诊所中选取1997年咨询过全科医生(GP)的消化不良患者。进行交叉表和逻辑回归分析以揭示患者特征和转诊决定因素。
1997年基层医疗中出现消化不良的患病率为3.4%(1740/48958)。这些患者在首次会诊时通常不被转诊。男性、老年患者以及有消化不良既往史的患者比其他消化不良患者更频繁地被转诊至二级医疗。同时被诊断为肠易激综合征和消化不良的患者被转诊的风险最高。
消化不良是基层医疗中常见的主诉,患者通常由其全科医生治疗。除了转诊的临床相关原因外,患有肠易激综合征的消化不良患者似乎比其他消化不良患者更“有风险”被转诊至二级医疗。在解释用于指南目的的研究时,应考虑基层和二级医疗中消化不良患者的差异。需要进一步研究以阐明肠易激综合征与消化不良之间关系的背景及其对转诊的影响。