Kanade A N, Gokhale M K, Rao S
Agharkar Research Institute, Pune, India.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2001 Aug;55(8):708-13. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601211.
To estimate the energy cost of resting (RMR), sitting and standing for urban Indian adults and compare these estimates with the reported values.
Energy costs were measured using oxylog while body fat was estimated using equipment (HBF300, OMRON Corporation, Japan) that works on the principle of bioelectrical impedance, for 24 men and 40 women, aged 20-50 y, engaged in sedentary activities.
Agharkar Research Institute, Pune, India.
Mean energy cost (kJ/min) of resting (RMR), sitting and standing were significantly (P<0.01, for all) higher for men (4.01+/-0.42, 5.0+/-0.72 and 5.74+/-0.69, respectively) than women (3.54+/-0.28, 4.03+/-0.41 and 4.35+/-0.52, respectively). Gender difference increased with the level of activity, from 13% for RMR to 32% for standing. These differences reduced when adjusted (using analysis of covariance) for body weight and became non-significant on adjusting for fat-free mass (FFM) in the case of RMR and sitting activity. The measured values of energy cost (absolute and per kg weight) for these activities were similar to African subjects but lower compared to Asian or European subjects for both sexes. The stepwise regression analysis done separately by sexes showed weight (29%) in men and body mass index (44%) in women to be the best predictors of RMR, while regression analysis for combined sexes indicated FFM and height as predictors of RMR (r(2)=56%, P<0.01). If means to estimate body fat were not available, RMR could best be predicted with BMI and sex as predictors (r(2)=55%; P<0.01). This was mainly due to the fact that the sex differences in our population were more prominent in FFM than that in BMI. Our observations thus indicate the need to develop prediction equations separately for different populations owing to differences in their body compositions, especially in fat mass (FM) or FFM.
The energy costs of activities were associated with body composition, especially with absolute fat-free mass, which may vary even with the same body fat percentage. Therefore, there is a need to develop separate prediction equations for different communities.
估算印度城市成年人静息代谢率(RMR)、坐姿和站姿的能量消耗,并将这些估算值与报告值进行比较。
对24名男性和40名年龄在20 - 50岁、从事久坐活动的女性,使用氧代谢仪测量能量消耗,同时使用基于生物电阻抗原理的设备(日本欧姆龙公司的HBF300)估算体脂。
印度浦那阿加尔卡尔研究所。
男性静息(RMR)、坐姿和站姿的平均能量消耗(千焦/分钟)(分别为4.01±0.42、5.0±0.72和5.74±0.69)显著高于女性(分别为3.54±0.28、4.03±0.41和4.35±0.52)(所有P<0.01)。性别差异随活动水平增加,从静息时的13%增加到站立时的32%。在根据体重进行调整(使用协方差分析)后,这些差异减小,在对静息代谢率和坐姿活动根据去脂体重(FFM)进行调整后差异不再显著。这些活动的能量消耗测量值(绝对值和每千克体重)与非洲受试者相似,但与亚洲或欧洲受试者相比,男女的数值均较低。按性别分别进行的逐步回归分析显示,男性中体重(29%)是静息代谢率的最佳预测指标,女性中体重指数(44%)是最佳预测指标,而对男女合并分析的回归分析表明去脂体重和身高是静息代谢率的预测指标(r² = 56%,P<0.01)。如果没有估算体脂的方法,用体重指数和性别作为预测指标能最好地预测静息代谢率(r² = 55%;P<0.01)。这主要是因为在我们的人群中,性别差异在去脂体重方面比在体重指数方面更显著。因此,我们的观察结果表明,由于不同人群身体组成的差异,尤其是脂肪量(FM)或去脂体重的差异,需要为不同人群分别制定预测方程。
活动的能量消耗与身体组成有关,尤其是与绝对去脂体重有关,即使体脂百分比相同,去脂体重也可能不同。因此,需要为不同群体制定单独的预测方程。