• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿尔茨海默病患者的预先医疗指示。伦理与临床考量。

Advance directives in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Ethical and clinical considerations.

作者信息

Vollmann J

机构信息

Institut für Geschichte der Medizin, Arbeitsgruppe Ethik in der Medizin, Freie Universität Berlin, Klingsorstr. 119, Berlin 12203, Germany.

出版信息

Med Health Care Philos. 2001;4(2):161-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1011491100267.

DOI:10.1023/a:1011491100267
PMID:11547502
Abstract

Advance patient directives are various forms of anticipatory medical directives made by competent individuals for the eventuality of future incompetence. They are therefore appropriate instruments for competent patients in the early stage of Alzheimer's disease to document their self-determined will in the advanced stages of dementia. Theoretical objections have been expressed against the concept of advance patient directives (problems of authenticity and identity) which, however, cannot negate the fundamental moral authority of advance patient directives. Therefore, patients, family members, and physicians should make use of the appropriate form of advance directive as part of common treatment and care planning. Advance directives, when utilized intelligently, represent appropriate instruments for shared decision-making by patient, family members and physician. They should be utilized to a greater extent, particularly for the treatment planning of demented patients.

摘要

预先医疗指示是有行为能力的个人针对未来可能丧失行为能力的情况所制定的各种形式的预期医疗指令。因此,对于处于阿尔茨海默病早期阶段的有行为能力的患者而言,预先医疗指示是合适的工具,可用于记录他们在痴呆晚期的自主意愿。针对预先医疗指示的概念存在一些理论上的反对意见(真实性和身份问题),然而,这些反对意见并不能否定预先医疗指示的基本道德权威性。因此,患者、家属和医生应采用适当形式的预先医疗指示,作为共同治疗和护理计划的一部分。如果明智地使用,预先医疗指示是患者、家属和医生共同决策的合适工具。应更广泛地利用预先医疗指示,特别是用于痴呆患者的治疗计划。

相似文献

1
Advance directives in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Ethical and clinical considerations.阿尔茨海默病患者的预先医疗指示。伦理与临床考量。
Med Health Care Philos. 2001;4(2):161-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1011491100267.
2
Autonomy, authenticity, or best interest: everyday decision-making and persons with dementia.自主性、本真性还是最佳利益:日常决策与痴呆症患者
Med Health Care Philos. 2001;4(2):153-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1011402102030.
3
Current legal status of advance directives in the United States.美国预先医疗指示的当前法律状况。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2004 Jul 15;116(13):420-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03040929.
4
Decision making by surrogates.代理人的决策制定
Crit Care Nurse. 2000 Apr;20(2):107-11.
5
Psychological and legal aspects of mental incompetence.精神无行为能力的心理与法律层面
Tex Med. 1998 Mar;94(3):64-7.
6
Advance consent for dementia research.痴呆症研究的预先同意。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8(Suppl. 4):19-27.
7
Advance directives and dementia.预立医疗指示与痴呆症
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000 Sep;913:105-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05165.x.
8
Proxy decision making in Alzheimer disease research: durable powers of attorney, guardianship, and other alternatives.阿尔茨海默病研究中的代理决策:持久授权书、监护及其他替代方案。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8(Suppl. 4):28-37.
9
Medical research on patients with dementia--the role of advance directives in European legal instruments.针对痴呆症患者的医学研究——预先指示在欧洲法律文书中的作用。
Eur J Health Law. 2006 Sep;13(3):235-61. doi: 10.1163/157180906778852394.
10
Beyond competence: advance directives in dementia research.超越能力范畴:痴呆症研究中的预先指示
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2015 Jun-Sep;33(2-3):167-80. doi: 10.1007/s40592-015-0034-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Advance directives in German memory clinics.德国记忆诊所中的预先指示。
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s00391-025-02455-z.
2
Navigating Dementia and Delirium: Balancing Identity and Interests in Advance Directives.应对痴呆与谵妄:在预先指示中平衡身份与利益
Nurs Philos. 2025 Jan;26(1):e70016. doi: 10.1111/nup.70016.
3
New Community and Sociohealth Challenges Arising from the Early Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).轻度认知障碍(MCI)早期诊断引发的新社区与社会健康挑战。

本文引用的文献

1
Whose will is it, anyway? A discussion of advance directives, personal identity, and consensus in medical ethics.到底是谁的意愿?关于预立医疗指示、个人身份认同与医学伦理共识的探讨
Bioethics. 1994 Jan;8(1):27-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1994.tb00240.x.
2
A proposal for the use of advance directives in the treatment of incompetent mentally ill persons.关于在无行为能力的精神病患者治疗中使用预先指示的提议。
Bioethics. 1993 Apr;7(2-3):247-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1993.tb00291.x.
3
Autonomy and the demented self.自主性与失智的自我。
J Pers Med. 2023 Sep 20;13(9):1410. doi: 10.3390/jpm13091410.
4
Project DECIDE, part 1: increasing the amount of valid advance directives in people with Alzheimer's disease by offering advance care planning-a prospective double-arm intervention study.DECIDE 项目,第 1 部分:通过提供预先护理计划来增加阿尔茨海默病患者中有效预先指令的数量 - 一项前瞻性双臂干预研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 9;23(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00854-0.
5
Motivations for people with cognitive impairment to complete an advance research directive - a qualitative interview study.认知障碍患者完成预先研究指示的动机 - 一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02741-7.
6
Stakeholders' Views on Early Diagnosis for Alzheimer's Disease, Clinical Trial Participation and Amyloid PET Disclosure: A Focus Group Study.利益相关者对阿尔茨海默病早期诊断、临床试验参与和淀粉样 PET 披露的看法:一项焦点小组研究。
J Bioeth Inq. 2019 Mar;16(1):45-59. doi: 10.1007/s11673-019-09901-9. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
7
Beyond competence: advance directives in dementia research.超越能力范畴:痴呆症研究中的预先指示
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2015 Jun-Sep;33(2-3):167-80. doi: 10.1007/s40592-015-0034-y.
8
Protecting prisoners' autonomy with advance directives: ethical dilemmas and policy issues.通过预先指示保护囚犯的自主权:伦理困境与政策问题。
Med Health Care Philos. 2015 Feb;18(1):33-9. doi: 10.1007/s11019-014-9571-z.
9
'Self-care without a self': Alzheimer's disease and the concept of personal responsibility for health.“无自我的自我护理”:阿尔茨海默病与健康的个人责任概念
Med Health Care Philos. 2008 Sep;11(3):315-24. doi: 10.1007/s11019-008-9125-3. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
10
Ethical issues in geriatric medicine: a unique problematic?老年医学中的伦理问题:一个独特的难题?
Health Care Anal. 2002;10(4):379-90. doi: 10.1023/A:1023479226847.
Milbank Q. 1986;64(Suppl. 2):4-16.
4
Views of elderly people on living wills: interview study.
BMJ. 2000 Jun 17;320(7250):1640-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7250.1640.
5
[Advance directives in clinical practice].[临床实践中的预先医疗指示]
Med Klin (Munich). 1999 Jul 15;94(7):398-405. doi: 10.1007/BF03044907.
6
Relationships between various attitudes towards self-determination in health care with special reference to an advance directive.医疗保健中对自我决定权的各种态度之间的关系,特别提及预先指示。
J Med Ethics. 1999 Feb;25(1):37-41. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.1.37.
7
[Advance directives from the medical viewpoint].[医学视角下的预先医疗指示]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 1997;147(6):117-20.
8
Advance end-of-life treatment planning. A research review.临终治疗规划进展。一项研究综述。
Arch Intern Med. 1996 May 27;156(10):1062-8.
9
Dworkin on dementia. Elegant theory, questionable policy.德沃金论痴呆症。理论精妙,政策存疑。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1995 Nov-Dec;25(6):32-8.
10
Establishing advance medical directives with demented patients: a pilot study.为痴呆患者制定预先医疗指示:一项试点研究。
J Clin Ethics. 1993 Spring;4(1):51-4.