Suppr超能文献

超越能力范畴:痴呆症研究中的预先指示

Beyond competence: advance directives in dementia research.

作者信息

Jongsma Karin Rolanda, van de Vathorst Suzanne

机构信息

Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Office NA 21.17, PO box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Monash Bioeth Rev. 2015 Jun-Sep;33(2-3):167-80. doi: 10.1007/s40592-015-0034-y.

Abstract

Dementia is highly prevalent and incurable. The participation of dementia patients in clinical research is indispensable if we want to find an effective treatment for dementia. However, one of the primary challenges in dementia research is the patients' gradual loss of the capacity to consent. Patients with dementia are characterized by the fact that, at an earlier stage of their life, they were able to give their consent to participation in research. Therefore, the phase when patients are still competent to decide offers a valuable opportunity to authorize research, by using an advance research directive (ARD). Yet, the use of ARDs as an authorization for research participation remains controversial. In this paper we discuss the role of autonomous decision-making and the protection of incompetent research subjects. We will show why ARDs are a morally defensible basis for the inclusion of this population in biomedical research and that the use of ARDs is compatible with the protection of incompetent research subjects.

摘要

痴呆症极为常见且无法治愈。如果我们想找到治疗痴呆症的有效方法,痴呆症患者参与临床研究必不可少。然而,痴呆症研究的主要挑战之一是患者逐渐丧失同意能力。痴呆症患者的特点是,在其生命的早期阶段,他们能够同意参与研究。因此,在患者仍有能力做出决定的阶段,通过使用预先研究指令(ARD)为研究授权提供了一个宝贵的机会。然而,将ARD用作参与研究的授权方式仍存在争议。在本文中,我们讨论自主决策的作用以及对无行为能力研究对象的保护。我们将说明为什么ARD是将这一人群纳入生物医学研究的道德上合理的依据,并且使用ARD与保护无行为能力研究对象是相容的。

相似文献

1
Beyond competence: advance directives in dementia research.超越能力范畴:痴呆症研究中的预先指示
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2015 Jun-Sep;33(2-3):167-80. doi: 10.1007/s40592-015-0034-y.
4
Advance consent for dementia research.痴呆症研究的预先同意。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8(Suppl. 4):19-27.
7
Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research.预先同意、重大利益与痴呆症研究。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Aug;41(8):701-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102024. Epub 2014 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

10
Advance Directives and the Descendant Argument.预立医疗指示与后代论证
HEC Forum. 2018 Mar;30(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s10730-017-9334-3.

本文引用的文献

2
3
Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research.预先同意、重大利益与痴呆症研究。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Aug;41(8):701-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102024. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
4
Law, ethics, and the patient preference predictor.法律、伦理与患者偏好预测器
J Med Philos. 2014 Apr;39(2):178-86. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhu004. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
9
A changing landscape for advance directives in dementia research.痴呆症研究中预立医疗指示的变化格局。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Feb;70(4):623-30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.037. Epub 2009 Nov 22.
10
Giving consent in dementia research.痴呆症研究中的同意问题。
Lancet. 2008 Jul 19;372(9634):183-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61049-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验