Chan L, Doctor J, Temkin N, MacLehose R F, Esselman P, Bell K, Dikmen S
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98185, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Sep;82(9):1151-4. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24892.
To determine if persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI) who are insured by Medicaid or health maintenance organizations (HMOs) are more likely to receive postacute care in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) than in rehabilitation facilities, compared with persons insured by commercial fee-for-service (FFS) plans.
Retrospective cohort study.
County hospital admitting 30% of all Washington State TBI patients.
Patients with moderate to severe TBI discharged to rehabilitation facilities or SNFs between 1992 and 1997 (n = 1271); 56.3% were insured by Medicaid, 26.1% by FFS plans, and 17.6% by HMOs.
Not applicable.
Disposition on discharge from acute care (rehabilitation facilities vs SNF); adjusted relative risk (RR) and confidence interval (CI) for different insurance types.
After accounting for confounding factors, Medicaid patients were 68% more likely (RR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.34-2.11) and HMO patients were 23% more likely (RR = 1.23, 95% CI =.90-1.68) to go to a SNF than FFS patients. However, the latter difference was not statistically significant.
An association exists between insurance type and postacute care site. Efforts should be made to determine the effect this relationship has on the cost and outcomes for TBI patients.
与商业按服务收费(FFS)计划参保者相比,确定医疗补助计划或健康维护组织(HMO)参保的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者是否比康复机构更有可能在熟练护理设施(SNF)接受急性后期护理。
回顾性队列研究。
接收华盛顿州30%的所有TBI患者的县医院。
1992年至1997年间出院至康复机构或SNF的中度至重度TBI患者(n = 1271);56.3%由医疗补助计划承保,26.1%由FFS计划承保,17.6%由HMO承保。
不适用。
急性护理出院时的处置情况(康复机构与SNF);不同保险类型的调整相对风险(RR)和置信区间(CI)。
在考虑混杂因素后,医疗补助计划患者前往SNF的可能性比FFS患者高68%(RR = 1.68,95%CI = 1.34 - 2.11),HMO患者前往SNF的可能性比FFS患者高23%(RR = 1.23,95%CI =.90 - 1.68)。然而,后一差异无统计学意义。
保险类型与急性后期护理地点之间存在关联。应努力确定这种关系对TBI患者的成本和结局的影响。