Gomes B P, Ferraz C C, Vianna M E, Berber V B, Teixeira F B, Souza-Filho F J
Endodontic Unit, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas-UNICAMP, SP, Brazil.
Int Endod J. 2001 Sep;34(6):424-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00410.x.
The aim of this study was to assess, in vitro, the effectiveness of several concentrations of NaOCl (0.5%, 1%, 2.5%, 4% and 5.25%) and two forms of chlorhexidine gluconate (gel and liquid) in three concentrations (0.2%, 1% and 2%) in the elimination of E. faecalis.
A broth dilution test using 24-well cell culture plates was performed and the time taken for the irrigants to kill bacterial cells was recorded. Isolated 24 h colonies of pure cultures of E. faecalis grown on 10% sheep blood plus Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar plates were suspended in sterile 0.85% NaCI solution. The cell suspension was adjusted spectrophotometrically to match the turbidity of a McFarland 0.5 scale. One mL of each tested substance was placed on the bottom of wells of 24-well cell culture plates (Corning, NY), including the control group (sterile saline). Six wells were used for each time period and irrigant concentration. Two mL of the bacterial suspension were ultrasonically mixed for 10 s with the irrigants and placed in contact with them for 10, 30, and 45 s; 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, and 30 min; and 1 and 2 h. After each period of time, 1 mL from each well was transferred to tubes containing 2 mL of freshly prepared BHI + neutralizers in order to prevent a residual action of the irrigants. All tubes were incubated at 37 degrees C for 7 days. The tubes considered to have positive growth were those which presented medium turbidity during the incubation period. Data were analysed statistically by the Kruskal-Wallis test. with the level of significance set at P < 0.05.
All irrigants were effective in killing E. faecalis. but at different times. Chlorhexidine in the liquid form at all concentrations tested (0.2%, 1% and 2%) and NaOCI (5.25%) were the most effective irrigants. However, the time required by 0.2% chlorhexidine liquid and 2% chlorhexidine gel to promote negative cultures was only 30 s and 1 min, respectively.
Even though all tested irrigants possessed antibacterial activity, the time required to eliminate E. faecalis depended on the concentration and type of irrigant used.
本研究的目的是在体外评估几种浓度的次氯酸钠(0.5%、1%、2.5%、4%和5.25%)以及两种形式的葡萄糖酸洗必泰(凝胶和液体,三种浓度分别为0.2%、1%和2%)对粪肠球菌的清除效果。
使用24孔细胞培养板进行肉汤稀释试验,并记录冲洗剂杀死细菌细胞所需的时间。将在含10%羊血加脑心浸液(BHI)琼脂平板上培养24小时的粪肠球菌纯培养物分离菌落悬浮于无菌0.85%氯化钠溶液中。通过分光光度法调整细胞悬液,使其浊度与麦氏0.5标准浊度匹配。将1 mL每种受试物质置于24孔细胞培养板(康宁公司,纽约)孔的底部,包括对照组(无菌生理盐水)。每个时间段和冲洗剂浓度使用6个孔。将2 mL细菌悬液与冲洗剂超声混合10秒,然后与冲洗剂接触10、30和45秒;1、3、5、10、20和三十分钟;以及1和2小时。在每个时间段后,从每个孔中取出1 mL转移至含有2 mL新鲜制备的BHI +中和剂的试管中,以防止冲洗剂的残留作用。所有试管在37摄氏度下孵育7天。在孵育期内培养基出现浑浊的试管被认为生长阳性。数据采用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计学分析,显著性水平设定为P < 0.05。
所有冲洗剂均能有效杀死粪肠球菌,但所需时间不同。所有测试浓度(0.2%、1%和2%)的液体形式洗必泰和次氯酸钠(5.25%)是最有效的冲洗剂。然而,0.2%洗必泰液体和2%洗必泰凝胶使培养物转阴所需的时间分别仅为30秒和1分钟。
尽管所有受试冲洗剂都具有抗菌活性,但清除粪肠球菌所需的时间取决于所用冲洗剂的浓度和类型。