Dametto Fábio Roberto, Ferraz Caio Cezar Randi, Gomes Brenda Paula Figueiredo de Almeida, Zaia Alexandre Augusto, Teixeira Fabricio Batista, de Souza-Filho Francisco José
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Jun;99(6):768-72. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.08.026.
The aim of this study was to assess in vitro the antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine gel against Enterococcus faecalis , comparing it to other endodontic irrigants (2% chlorhexidine liquid and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite).
Eighty roots of human mandibular premolars were prepared by serial instrumentation technique, autoclaved, and contaminated for 7 days with E faecalis monocultures. The roots were then divided into 5 groups according to the irrigant substance used during the standardized biomechanical preparation. In order to evaluate the antimicrobial action of the irrigant substances, 3 microbial samples were taken: initial (before the biomechanical preparation); post-treatment (immediately after the biomechanical preparation), and final (7 days after the biomechanical preparation). The microbiological samples were plated to count the colony-forming units (CFU).
The 2% chlorhexidine gel and 2% chlorhexidine liquid significantly reduced the E faecalis CFU in the post-treatment and final microbiological samples. The 5.25% sodium hypochlorite also reduced the E faecalis CFU immediately after the root canal instrumentation, but it was not able to keep the root canal free of detectable E faecalis in the final sample.
The 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (gel and liquid) antimicrobial ability was more effective than 5.25% sodium hypochlorite in keeping low CFU of E faecalis for 7 days after the biomechanical preparation.
本研究旨在体外评估2%氯己定凝胶对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性,并将其与其他根管冲洗剂(2%氯己定溶液和5.25%次氯酸钠)进行比较。
采用系列预备技术对80颗人下颌前磨牙牙根进行预备,高压灭菌后,用粪肠球菌单培养物污染7天。然后根据标准化生物力学预备过程中使用的冲洗剂物质将牙根分为5组。为了评估冲洗剂物质的抗菌作用,采集3个微生物样本:初始样本(生物力学预备前)、治疗后样本(生物力学预备后立即采集)和最终样本(生物力学预备后7天采集)。将微生物样本接种培养以计数菌落形成单位(CFU)。
2%氯己定凝胶和2%氯己定溶液在治疗后和最终微生物样本中显著降低了粪肠球菌CFU。5.25%次氯酸钠在根管预备后立即也降低了粪肠球菌CFU,但在最终样本中未能使根管内检测不到粪肠球菌。
在生物力学预备后7天内,2%葡萄糖酸氯己定(凝胶和溶液)的抗菌能力在保持低粪肠球菌CFU方面比5.25%次氯酸钠更有效。