Gasparini R, Pozzi T, Montomoli E, Fragapane E, Senatore F, Minutello M, Podda A
Institute of Hygiene, University of Siena, Italy.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17(2):135-40. doi: 10.1023/a:1017919305501.
Three-hundred and eight outpatient elderly subjects (> or = 65 years) were randomly assigned to receive the MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine (FLU-AD; n = 204) or a conventional subunit influenza vaccine (AGRIPPAL S1; n = 104) in order to compare the safety and immunogenicity of the two vaccines. Although mild pain at the injection site was reported more frequently by subjects immunised with the adjuvanted vaccine, both vaccines were shown to be safe and well tolerated. The adjuvanted vaccine was more immunogenic as indicated by higher post-immunisation geometric mean titres (GMTs) and by higher proportions of subjects with post-immunisation > or = four fold increases of antibody titres or subjects with > or = 1/160 post-immunisation HI titres. These differences, statistically significant for all three strains after immunisation, indicated that, by addition of the MF59 adjuvant emulsion, conventional subunit influenza antigens acquire an enhanced immunogenicity without any clinically significant increase of their reactogenicity.
308名门诊老年受试者(≥65岁)被随机分配接受含MF59佐剂的流感疫苗(FLU - AD;n = 204)或传统亚单位流感疫苗(AGRIPPAL S1;n = 104),以比较两种疫苗的安全性和免疫原性。尽管接种佐剂疫苗的受试者报告注射部位轻度疼痛的频率更高,但两种疫苗均显示安全且耐受性良好。接种后几何平均滴度(GMT)更高,以及接种后抗体滴度升高≥4倍的受试者比例或接种后血凝抑制(HI)滴度≥1/160的受试者比例更高,表明佐剂疫苗具有更强的免疫原性。免疫后针对所有三种毒株这些差异均具有统计学意义,这表明通过添加MF59佐剂乳剂,传统亚单位流感抗原的免疫原性增强,而其反应原性无任何临床显著增加。