Reichert H, Simeone A
Institute of Zoology, Biozentrum/Pharmazentrum, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001 Oct 29;356(1414):1533-44. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0972.
The widely held notion of an independent evolutionary origin of invertebrate and vertebrate brains is based on classical phylogenetic, neuroanatomical and embryological data. The interpretation of these data in favour of a polyphyletic origin of animals brains is currently being challenged by three fundamental findings that derive from comparative molecular, genetic and developmental analyses. First, modern molecular systematics indicates that none of the extant animals correspond to evolutionary intermediates between the protostomes and the deuterostomes, thus making it impossible to deduce the morphological organization of the ancestral bilaterian or its brain from living species. Second, recent molecular genetic evidence for the body axis inversion hypothesis now supports the idea that the basic body plan of vertebrates and invertebrates is similar but inverted, suggesting that the ventral nerve chord of protostome invertebrates is homologous to the dorsal nerve cord of deuterostome chordates. Third, a developmental genetic analysis of the molecular control elements involved in early embryonic brain patterning is uncovering the existence of structurally and functionally homologous genes that have comparable and interchangeable functions in key aspects of brain development in invertebrate and vertebrate model systems. All three of these findings are compatible with the hypothesis of a monophyletic origin of the bilaterian brain. Here we review these findings and consider their significance and implications for current thinking on the evolutionary origin of bilaterian brains. We also preview the impact of comparative functional genomic analyses on our understanding of brain evolution.
关于无脊椎动物和脊椎动物大脑具有独立进化起源的广泛观点,是基于经典的系统发育、神经解剖学和胚胎学数据。目前,来自比较分子、遗传和发育分析的三项基本发现对这些支持动物大脑多源起源的数据解释提出了挑战。第一,现代分子系统学表明,现存动物中没有一种与原口动物和后口动物之间的进化中间形态相对应,因此无法从现存物种推断出祖先两侧对称动物或其大脑的形态组织。第二,最近关于体轴反转假说的分子遗传学证据现在支持了这样一种观点,即脊椎动物和无脊椎动物的基本身体结构相似但相反,这表明原口动物无脊椎动物的腹侧神经索与后口动物脊索动物的背侧神经索是同源的。第三,对参与早期胚胎大脑模式形成的分子控制元件进行的发育遗传学分析,正在揭示在无脊椎动物和脊椎动物模型系统的大脑发育关键方面具有可比且可互换功能的结构和功能同源基因的存在。所有这三项发现都与两侧对称动物大脑单源起源的假说相一致。在此,我们回顾这些发现,并考虑它们对当前关于两侧对称动物大脑进化起源的思考的意义和影响。我们还预览了比较功能基因组分析对我们理解大脑进化的影响。