Karenberg A, Hort I
Institute for the History of Medicine and Medical Ethics, University of Cologne, Germany.
J Hist Neurosci. 1998 Dec;7(113 Pt 2):162-73. doi: 10.1076/jhin.7.3.162.1849.
This first of a series of papers on the history of stroke presents an examination of a number of exemplary Greek and Latin sources, ranging from late antiquity to the dawn of the Middle Ages. We first establish a chronological order of various groups of texts and, whenever possible, ascertain the relationship of one group of writings to another. In the second century A.D., Galen had used the Hippocratic concept of humoral imbalance as a fundamental explanatory mechanism for the interpretation of clinical manifestations of apoplexy. Galen definitely rejected the Aristotelian precept of the primacy of the heart. According to his teaching, stroke resulted from the accumulation of a thick and dense humor in the ventricles of the brain blocking the passage of the animal spirit. Galen's Greek texts became axiomatic for compilers of the Byzantine period (Aetius of Amida, Alexander of Tralles, Paulus of Aegina). But his ideas contrasted starkly with the theories of the Methodical School which exerted - through the Latin writings of Caelius Aurelianus - a certain influence on authors of the Latin West (Cassius Felix, Theodorus Priscianus). References to stroke can also be found in many theological writings of the early Middle Ages.
这一系列关于中风历史的论文中的第一篇,对从古代晚期到中世纪早期的一些具有代表性的希腊和拉丁文献进行了审视。我们首先梳理了各类文本的时间顺序,并尽可能确定一组文献与另一组文献之间的关系。公元2世纪,盖伦采用了希波克拉底的体液失衡概念,作为解释中风临床表现的基本机制。盖伦明确拒绝了亚里士多德关于心脏首要地位的教义。按照他的学说,中风是由于浓稠的体液在脑室中积聚,阻碍了动物精气的通行所致。盖伦的希腊文著作成为拜占庭时期(阿米达的埃提乌斯、特拉勒斯的亚历山大、埃伊纳岛的保罗)编纂者的公理。但他的观点与方法论派的理论形成鲜明对比,方法论派通过凯利乌斯·奥雷利安努斯的拉丁文著作,对拉丁西方的作者(卡西乌斯·费利克斯、西奥多罗斯·普里西安努斯)产生了一定影响。在中世纪早期的许多神学著作中也能找到关于中风的论述。