Primosch R E, Barr E S
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Oct;132(10):1442-51; quiz 1461. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0061.
Pit and fissure sealant use varies widely among dentists. The authors conducted a survey to determine the current variations and patterns of sealant placement among pediatric dentists.
The authors mailed a 20-question survey to American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry members from six states, who represented one-third (1,210) of the membership, as well as to all 52 pediatric dentistry departments in U.S. dental schools. The authors examined selection criteria, placement techniques, evaluation methodologies, and the one- and three-year estimated success and reapplication rates of sealant placement.
The response rates were 70 percent for practitioners and 90 percent for dental schools. Approximately 80 percent of respondents said they sealed caries-free and questionable carious surfaces. Only 20 percent of the respondents said they sealed incipient carious surfaces; none said they would seal overt caries. Surface preparation was used always or sometimes by 87 percent of the respondents. The estimated one- and three-year sealant retention rates were 89 percent and 78 percent, respectively, for practitioners and 83 percent and 71 percent, respectively, for dental schools.
The survey demonstrated wide variations in selection criteria, placement techniques and evaluation methodologies, yet showed remarkable similarities between practitioners and dental schools. The reported retention rates were consistent with those reported in the literature.
The survey results suggested that pediatric dentists were searching for evidence-based selection criteria and a technique protocol for sealant placement that improved clinical success. The wide technique variations reported were likely a result of training diversity, diagnostic uncertainty, technique and material sensitivity, and an attempt to improve the success rate.
窝沟封闭剂的使用在牙医中差异很大。作者进行了一项调查,以确定儿科牙医目前在窝沟封闭剂放置方面的差异和模式。
作者向来自六个州的美国儿科学会会员邮寄了一份包含20个问题的调查问卷,这些会员占会员总数的三分之一(1210人),同时也向美国牙科学院的所有52个儿科牙科部门发送了问卷。作者研究了选择标准、放置技术、评估方法以及窝沟封闭剂放置的一年和三年估计成功率及重新应用率。
从业者的回复率为70%,牙科学院的回复率为90%。约80%的受访者表示他们会对无龋和可疑龋表面进行封闭。只有20%的受访者表示他们会对早期龋表面进行封闭;没有人表示会对明显龋进行封闭。87%的受访者总是或有时会进行表面处理。从业者的窝沟封闭剂一年和三年保留率估计分别为89%和78%,牙科学院分别为83%和71%。
该调查表明在选择标准、放置技术和评估方法上存在很大差异,但从业者和牙科学院之间也存在显著相似之处。报告的保留率与文献中报道的一致。
调查结果表明,儿科牙医正在寻找基于证据的选择标准和窝沟封闭剂放置技术方案,以提高临床成功率。报道的技术差异很大可能是由于培训多样性、诊断不确定性、技术和材料敏感性以及提高成功率的尝试所致。