• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非正式角色与跨学科团队发展阶段

Informal roles and the stages of interdisciplinary team development.

作者信息

Farrell M P, Schmitt M H, Heinemann G D

机构信息

Department of Sociology, 430 Park Hall, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.

出版信息

J Interprof Care. 2001 Aug;15(3):281-95. doi: 10.1080/13561820120068980.

DOI:10.1080/13561820120068980
PMID:11705236
Abstract

After presenting a theory of team development, we propose that the informal role structure of a team is dependent upon the degree of anomie in the team culture, and we provide measures of anomie and informal roles that can be used in field settings. Then we test hypotheses on a national sample of 111 interdisciplinary health care teams in geriatrics in US Veterans Affairs medical centers. We find evidence that as teams develop from early to later stages, the interpersonal behavior of members becomes less differentiated on three dimensions: prominence, sociability, and task-orientation. In addition, we find that images of each member come into clearer focus, as evidenced by reduced variation in how each member is seen by other team members. Finally, we find that regardless of stage of team development, the more education the team members have, the more prominent and task-oriented they are. In general, physicians score highest in prominence and task-orientation, but relatively low in sociability.

摘要

在提出团队发展理论之后,我们认为团队的非正式角色结构取决于团队文化中的失范程度,并提供了可在实地环境中使用的失范和非正式角色的衡量方法。然后,我们在美国退伍军人事务医疗中心对111个老年医学跨学科医疗团队的全国样本进行了假设检验。我们发现,随着团队从早期发展到后期阶段,成员的人际行为在三个维度上的差异变小:突出性、社交性和任务导向性。此外,我们发现每个成员的形象变得更加清晰,这表现为团队其他成员对每个成员看法的差异减小。最后,我们发现,无论团队发展处于哪个阶段,团队成员受教育程度越高,他们就越突出且任务导向性越强。总体而言,医生在突出性和任务导向性方面得分最高,但在社交性方面得分相对较低。

相似文献

1
Informal roles and the stages of interdisciplinary team development.非正式角色与跨学科团队发展阶段
J Interprof Care. 2001 Aug;15(3):281-95. doi: 10.1080/13561820120068980.
2
Reducing the failure risk of interdisciplinary healthcare teams.降低跨学科医疗团队的失败风险。
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2009 Apr-Jun;32(2):81-8. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0b013e3181a27af2.
3
"It goes beyond good camaraderie": A qualitative study of the process of becoming an interprofessional healthcare "teamlet".“这超越了良好的同志情谊”:一项关于成为跨专业医疗“小团队”过程的定性研究
J Interprof Care. 2016 May;30(3):295-300. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1130028. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
4
The empowerment paradox as a central challenge to patient centered medical home implementation in the veteran's health administration.赋权悖论是退伍军人健康管理局以患者为中心的医疗之家实施面临的核心挑战。
J Interprof Care. 2015 Jan;29(1):26-33. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.937480. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
5
Interprofessional team member's satisfaction: a mixed methods study of a Chilean hospital.跨专业团队成员的满意度:智利一家医院的混合方法研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2018 Jul 11;16(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0290-z.
6
Using an improvement model to reduce adverse drug events in VA facilities.运用改进模型减少退伍军人事务部医疗机构中的药物不良事件。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 May;27(5):243-54. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27021-7.
7
Frail older patient care by interdisciplinary teams: a primer for generalists.跨学科团队对体弱老年患者的护理:全科医生入门指南
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2003;24(2):51-62. doi: 10.1300/j021v24n02_05.
8
Teamwork and communication in surgical teams: implications for patient safety.外科团队中的团队合作与沟通:对患者安全的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Jan;206(1):107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.281. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
9
Expanding the role of clinical pharmacists on interdisciplinary primary care teams for chronic pain and opioid management.扩大临床药师在跨学科基层医疗团队中对慢性疼痛和阿片类药物管理的作用。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 3;19(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0783-9.
10
A typology for health care teams.医疗团队的分类法。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2010 Oct-Dec;35(4):345-54. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181e9fceb.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing collaboration among team scientists within a triadic research center partnership.评估三元研究中心伙伴关系中团队科学家之间的合作。
Qual Res Med Healthc. 2021 Oct 5;5(2):9724. doi: 10.4081/qrmh.2021.9724.
2
Strategies for Improving Access to Cancer Services in Rural Communities: A Pre-implementation Study.改善农村社区癌症服务可及性的策略:一项实施前研究
Front Health Serv. 2022 Mar 14;2:818519. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.818519. eCollection 2022.
3
The role of psychological safety and learning behavior in the development of effective quality improvement teams in Ghana: an observational study.
心理安全和学习行为在加纳有效质量改进团队发展中的作用:一项观察性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4234-7.
4
The analysis of the trend of educational system in orthotics and prosthetics in Iran and the world: A step toward the foresight.伊朗及全球矫形与假肢教育体系趋势分析:迈向预见的一步。
J Res Med Sci. 2019 Mar 25;24:25. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_645_18. eCollection 2019.
5
Collaborating in the context of co-location: a grounded theory study.在同地办公环境下的协作:一项扎根理论研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 10;17:30. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0427-x.
6
Expectations and requests regarding team training interventions to promote interdisciplinary collaboration in medical rehabilitation--A qualitative study.关于促进医学康复中跨学科协作的团队培训干预措施的期望与需求——一项定性研究
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Aug 19;15:135. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0413-3.
7
Silos and social identity: the social identity approach as a framework for understanding and overcoming divisions in health care.筒仓与社会认同:以社会认同理论为框架,理解和克服医疗保健中的分歧
Milbank Q. 2012 Jun;90(2):347-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00666.x.
8
Family members' informal roles in end-of-life decision making in adult intensive care units.成年重症监护病房中,家庭成员在临终决策中的非正式角色。
Am J Crit Care. 2012 Jan;21(1):43-51. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2012520.
9
A proposed systems approach to the evaluation of integrated palliative care.一种针对姑息治疗综合评估的系统方法的建议。
BMC Palliat Care. 2010 May 10;9:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-9-8.
10
Judgements about fellow professionals and the management of patients receiving palliative care in primary care: a qualitative study.关于基层医疗中同行专业人员的评判以及接受姑息治疗患者的管理:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Apr;58(549):264-72. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08x279652.