Grundy E, Holt G
Centre for Population Studies, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Dec;55(12):895-904. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.12.895.
To identify which of seven indicators of socioeconomic status used singly or combined with one other would be most useful in studies of health inequalities in the older population.
Secondary analysis of socioeconomic and health data in a two wave survey.
Great Britain. Participants were interviewed at home by a trained interviewer.
Nationally representative sample of 3543 adults aged 55-69 interviewed in 1988/9, 2243 of whom were interviewed again in 1994.
Desirable features of socioeconomic measurement systems for identifying health inequalities in older populations were identified with reference to the literature. Logistic regression was used to examine variations in self reported health by seven indicators of socioeconomic status. The pair of indicators with the greatest explanatory power was identified.
All indicators were significantly associated with differences in self reported health. The best pair of variables, according to criteria used, was educational qualification or social class paired with a deprivation indicator.
For a range of reasons the measurement of socioeconomic status is particularly challenging in older age groups. Extending our knowledge of which indicators work well in analyses and are relatively easy to collect should help both further study of health inequalities in the older population and appropriate planning.
确定七个社会经济地位指标中单独使用或相互结合使用时,哪一个在老年人群健康不平等研究中最有用。
对一项两阶段调查中的社会经济和健康数据进行二次分析。
英国。由经过培训的访员在家中对参与者进行访谈。
1988/1989年对3543名年龄在55 - 69岁的成年人进行全国代表性抽样访谈,其中2243人在1994年再次接受访谈。
参考文献确定用于识别老年人群健康不平等的社会经济测量系统的理想特征。采用逻辑回归分析七个社会经济地位指标与自我报告健康状况差异之间的关系。确定解释力最强的一对指标。
所有指标均与自我报告健康状况的差异显著相关。根据所使用的标准,最佳的一对变量是教育程度或社会阶层与贫困指标相结合。
由于一系列原因,社会经济地位的测量在老年人群体中尤其具有挑战性。扩展我们对哪些指标在分析中效果良好且相对易于收集的认识,应有助于进一步研究老年人群的健康不平等问题以及进行适当的规划。