Suppr超能文献

询问证人:强迫性虚构和确认性反馈会增加错误记忆。

Interviewing witnesses: forced confabulation and confirmatory feedback increase false memories.

作者信息

Zaragoza M S, Payment K E, Ackil J K, Drivdahl S B, Beck M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2001 Nov;12(6):473-7. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00388.

Abstract

In two experiments, adults who witnessed a videotaped event subsequently engaged in face-to-face interviews during which they were forced to confabulate information about the events they had seen. The interviewer selectively reinforced some of the participants' confabulated responses by providing confirmatory feedback (e.g., "Yes, ______ is the correct answer") and provided neutral (uninformative) feedback for the remaining confabulated responses (e.g., "O.K_____". One week later participants developed false memories for the events they had earlier confabulated knowingly. However confirmatory feedback increased false memory for forcibly confabulated events, increased confidence in those false memories, and increased the likelihood that participants wouldfreely report the confabulated events 1 to 2 months later The results illustrate the powerful role of social-motivational factors in promoting the development offalse memories.

摘要

在两项实验中,目睹录像事件的成年人随后参加了面对面访谈,期间他们被迫虚构有关所目睹事件的信息。访谈者通过提供确认性反馈(例如,“是的,_是正确答案”)来选择性地强化一些参与者虚构的回答,并对其余虚构的回答提供中性(无信息性)反馈(例如,“好的”)。一周后,参与者对他们之前故意虚构的事件产生了错误记忆。然而,确认性反馈增加了对被迫虚构事件的错误记忆,增强了对这些错误记忆的信心,并增加了参与者在1至2个月后自由报告虚构事件的可能性。结果说明了社会动机因素在促进错误记忆发展方面的强大作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验