Marshall S J, Biddle S J
British Heart Foundation National Centre for Physical Activity and Health, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.
Ann Behav Med. 2001 Fall;23(4):229-46. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2304_2.
The purpose of this study was to summarize findings from empirical applications of the transtheoretical model (TTM) (Prochaska & DiClemente, 1983) in the physical activity domain by using the quantitative method of meta-analysis. Ninety-one independent samples from 71 published reports were located that present empirical data on at least one core construct of the TTM applied to exercise and physical activity. In general, results support the application because core constructs differ across stages and most changes are in the direction predicted by the theory. Three general conclusions are offered. First, existing data are unable to confirm whether physical activity behavior change occurs in a series ofstages that are qualitatively different or along adjacent segments of an underlying continuum. Second, the growing number of studies that incorporate TTM concepts means that there is an increasing need to standardize and improve the reliability of measurement. Finally, the role ofprocesses of change needs reexamining because the higher order constructs are not apparent in the physical activity domain and stage-by-process interactions are not evident. There now are sufficient data to confirm that stage membership is associated with different levels of physical activity, self-efficacy, pros and cons, and processes of change. Further studies that simply stage participants or examine cross-sectional differences between core constructs of the TTM are of limited use. Future research should examine the moderators and mediators of stage transition.
本研究的目的是通过元分析的定量方法,总结跨理论模型(TTM)(Prochaska和DiClemente,1983)在身体活动领域的实证应用结果。从71篇已发表报告中找到了91个独立样本,这些样本呈现了应用于运动和身体活动的TTM至少一个核心构念的实证数据。总体而言,结果支持该模型的应用,因为核心构念在不同阶段存在差异,且大多数变化符合该理论的预测方向。得出了三个一般性结论。第一,现有数据无法证实身体活动行为的改变是发生在一系列质的不同阶段,还是沿着潜在连续体的相邻部分。第二,纳入TTM概念的研究数量不断增加,这意味着越来越需要标准化并提高测量的可靠性。最后,改变过程的作用需要重新审视,因为高阶构念在身体活动领域并不明显,且阶段与过程的相互作用也不显著。现在有足够的数据证实阶段归属与身体活动、自我效能、利弊及改变过程的不同水平相关。单纯对参与者进行阶段划分或研究TTM核心构念之间横断面差异的进一步研究用途有限。未来的研究应考察阶段转换的调节因素和中介因素。