Suppr超能文献

尿液自动微生物检测系统

The Automicrobic System for urines.

作者信息

Nicholson D P, Koepke J A

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Dec;10(6):823-33. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.6.823-833.1979.

Abstract

An evaluation of the Automicrobic System (AMS) for Urines (Vitek Systems, Inc.) was carried out under the auspices of the Product Evaluation Committee of the College of American Pathologists from the period June 1977 through October 1978. Data generated during this evaluation indicated that, when comparing the AMS methodology to our clinical microbiology laboratory methodology, a 37% time saving could be realized by utilizing the AMS. Quantitation with the AMS showed a 99% correlation with the clinical microbiology laboratory method except for yeast which correlated only 50% of the time. The average overall identification accuracy was 95%. Negative response accuracy was 99%. Other members of the Enterobacteriaceae which the instrument is not designed to identify may produce erroneous results if they occur in urine specimens. Specimens containing two organisms were identified with a 94% correlation when compared to our conventional methodology. The time when a well becomes positive may be used as a fairly reliable indicator of significance (count greater than 70,000 colony-forming units per ml) for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella-Enterobacter group, and group D Enterococcus, but not for Proteus sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and yeast. Specimen collection must be performed properly since specimens considered as contaminated by conventional plating-out techniques may be reported out by the AMS as only one or two organisms and thus lead to an erroneous assumption as to significance. Cost per specimen was $1.83 more by utilizing the AMS method as compared to our conventional method. This is offset by a saving of 1.74 h daily of personnel time and a final report in 13 h. At least 30 urine specimens would be needed daily to pay for the instrument and specimen costs in 1 year. The AMS can provide significant aid to a clinical microbiology laboratory when all factors are considered.

摘要

1977年6月至1978年10月期间,在美国病理学家学会产品评估委员会的支持下,对尿液自动微生物分析系统(AMS,维泰克系统公司)进行了评估。该评估期间产生的数据表明,将AMS方法与我们临床微生物实验室方法进行比较时,使用AMS可节省37%的时间。除酵母外,AMS定量分析与临床微生物实验室方法的相关性为99%,酵母的相关性仅为50%。总体平均鉴定准确率为95%,阴性反应准确率为99%。如果尿液标本中出现该仪器未设计鉴定的肠杆菌科其他成员,可能会产生错误结果。与我们的传统方法相比,含有两种微生物的标本鉴定相关性为94%。对于大肠杆菌、克雷伯菌-肠杆菌属和D群肠球菌,孔出现阳性的时间可作为判断其重要性(计数大于每毫升70000个菌落形成单位)的相当可靠指标,但对于变形杆菌属、铜绿假单胞菌和酵母则不然。必须正确采集标本,因为被传统平板接种技术视为污染的标本,AMS可能报告为仅有一种或两种微生物,从而导致对其重要性的错误判断。与我们的传统方法相比,使用AMS方法每个标本的成本高出1.83美元。但每天可节省1.74小时的人员时间,并能在13小时内出具最终报告,这抵消了成本增加。每年至少需要30份尿液标本才能支付仪器和标本成本。综合考虑所有因素,AMS可为临床微生物实验室提供重要帮助。

相似文献

1
The Automicrobic System for urines.尿液自动微生物检测系统
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Dec;10(6):823-33. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.6.823-833.1979.
7
Automated microbiological detection/identification system.自动化微生物检测/鉴定系统。
J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Oct;6(4):406-13. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.406-413.1977.

引用本文的文献

2
Screening of urine cultures by three automated systems.通过三种自动化系统对尿培养进行筛查。
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Mar;15(3):468-74. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.3.468-474.1982.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验