Suppr超能文献

在自动微生物系统中使用肠杆菌科加生化鉴定卡进行早期鉴定的可靠性。

Reliability of early identifications obtained with Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical cards in the automicrobic system.

作者信息

Barry A L, Badal R E

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Aug;16(2):257-65. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.2.257-265.1982.

Abstract

The AutoMicrobic system (AMS) is capable of identifying most Enterobacteriaceae within 8 h and many glucose-nonfermenting, gram-negative bacilli after 13 h of incubation. Early preliminary results can be readily obtained from the computer as the tests incubate. Data with 1,023 bacterial isolates were reviewed to determine the relative accuracy of 4-, 6-, 8-, 10-, and 13-h identifications. All AutoMicrobic system identifications with probability (P) values of less than 0.80 were considered equivocal responses which needed supplementary tests before a final report could be issued. Analysis of our data suggests that early identifications of Morganella morganii, Acinetobacter sp., Yersinia spp., Salmonella spp. (other than Salmonella typhi), Shigella spp. (other than Shigella sonnei), Enterobacter agglomerans, Pseudomonas spp. (other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Pseudomonas maltophilia), Klebsiella spp. (other than Klebsiella pneumoniae or Klebsiella oxytoca), Citrobacter amalonauticus, Serratia liquefaciens, or Vibrio spp. Should be considered nonspecific responses, even when P greater than or equal to 0.80. Other identifications reported after 4 h were 96% accurate. At least half of our isolates (60% of our Enterobacteriaceae) could be identified reliably within 4 h, the remaining isolates required longer incubation.

摘要

自动微生物鉴定系统(AMS)能够在8小时内鉴定出大多数肠杆菌科细菌,并在培养13小时后鉴定出许多非发酵葡萄糖的革兰氏阴性杆菌。随着测试培养,早期初步结果可随时从计算机中获得。对1023株细菌分离株的数据进行了审查,以确定4小时、6小时、8小时、10小时和13小时鉴定的相对准确性。所有概率(P)值小于0.80的自动微生物鉴定系统鉴定结果均被视为模棱两可的反应,在发布最终报告之前需要进行补充测试。对我们数据的分析表明,摩根氏摩根菌、不动杆菌属、耶尔森菌属、沙门氏菌属(伤寒沙门氏菌除外)、志贺氏菌属(宋内志贺氏菌除外)、聚团肠杆菌、假单胞菌属(铜绿假单胞菌或嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌除外)、克雷伯菌属(肺炎克雷伯菌或产酸克雷伯菌除外)、无丙二酸柠檬酸杆菌、液化沙雷氏菌或弧菌属的早期鉴定结果应被视为非特异性反应,即使P大于或等于0.80。4小时后报告的其他鉴定结果准确率为96%。我们至少一半的分离株(60%的肠杆菌科细菌)能够在4小时内可靠鉴定,其余分离株需要更长时间的培养。

相似文献

7
Comparison of three methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;1(2):76-81. doi: 10.1007/BF02014195.

引用本文的文献

10
Automated systems for identification of microorganisms.微生物鉴定自动化系统
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1992 Jul;5(3):302-27. doi: 10.1128/CMR.5.3.302.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验