Merz Jon F, Magnus David, Cho Mildred K, Caplan Arthur L
Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Market Street, Suite 320, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308, USA.
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Apr;70(4):965-71. doi: 10.1086/339767. Epub 2002 Feb 27.
Biomedical researchers often assume that sponsors, subjects, families, and disease-associated advocacy groups contribute to research solely because of altruism. This view fails to capture the diverse interests of many participants in the emerging research enterprise. In the past two decades, patient groups have become increasingly active in the promotion and facilitation of genetics research. Simultaneously, a significant shift of academic biomedical science toward commercialization has occurred, spurred by U.S. federal policy changes. The concurrent rise in both the roles that subjects play and the commercial interests they have presents numerous ethical challenges. We examine the interests of different research participants, finding that these interests are not addressed by current policies and practices. We conclude that all participants should be given a voice in decisions affecting ownership, access to, and use of commercialized products and services, and that researchers and institutions should negotiate issues relating to control of research results and the sharing of benefits before the research is performed.
生物医学研究人员常常认为,资助者、受试者、家属以及疾病相关倡导团体仅仅是出于利他主义才参与研究。这种观点未能涵盖新兴研究事业中许多参与者的多样利益。在过去二十年里,患者团体在促进遗传学研究方面变得越来越活跃。与此同时,在美国联邦政策变化的推动下,学术生物医学科学出现了向商业化的重大转变。受试者所扮演角色及其商业利益的同时增加带来了诸多伦理挑战。我们审视了不同研究参与者的利益,发现当前的政策和实践并未解决这些利益问题。我们得出结论,在影响商业化产品和服务的所有权、获取和使用的决策中,应让所有参与者都有发言权,并且研究人员和机构应在研究开展之前就与研究结果控制权及利益共享相关的问题进行协商。