Suppr超能文献

保护遗传学研究中受试者的利益。

Protecting subjects' interests in genetics research.

作者信息

Merz Jon F, Magnus David, Cho Mildred K, Caplan Arthur L

机构信息

Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Market Street, Suite 320, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Apr;70(4):965-71. doi: 10.1086/339767. Epub 2002 Feb 27.

Abstract

Biomedical researchers often assume that sponsors, subjects, families, and disease-associated advocacy groups contribute to research solely because of altruism. This view fails to capture the diverse interests of many participants in the emerging research enterprise. In the past two decades, patient groups have become increasingly active in the promotion and facilitation of genetics research. Simultaneously, a significant shift of academic biomedical science toward commercialization has occurred, spurred by U.S. federal policy changes. The concurrent rise in both the roles that subjects play and the commercial interests they have presents numerous ethical challenges. We examine the interests of different research participants, finding that these interests are not addressed by current policies and practices. We conclude that all participants should be given a voice in decisions affecting ownership, access to, and use of commercialized products and services, and that researchers and institutions should negotiate issues relating to control of research results and the sharing of benefits before the research is performed.

摘要

生物医学研究人员常常认为,资助者、受试者、家属以及疾病相关倡导团体仅仅是出于利他主义才参与研究。这种观点未能涵盖新兴研究事业中许多参与者的多样利益。在过去二十年里,患者团体在促进遗传学研究方面变得越来越活跃。与此同时,在美国联邦政策变化的推动下,学术生物医学科学出现了向商业化的重大转变。受试者所扮演角色及其商业利益的同时增加带来了诸多伦理挑战。我们审视了不同研究参与者的利益,发现当前的政策和实践并未解决这些利益问题。我们得出结论,在影响商业化产品和服务的所有权、获取和使用的决策中,应让所有参与者都有发言权,并且研究人员和机构应在研究开展之前就与研究结果控制权及利益共享相关的问题进行协商。

相似文献

1
Protecting subjects' interests in genetics research.保护遗传学研究中受试者的利益。
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Apr;70(4):965-71. doi: 10.1086/339767. Epub 2002 Feb 27.
2
Gene donors' rights at risk.基因捐赠者的权利面临风险。
Nature. 1996 May 2;381(6577):1. doi: 10.1038/381001a0.
4
The commercialization of human genetics: profits and problems.人类遗传学的商业化:利润与问题
Mol Med Today. 1998 Apr;4(4):148-50. doi: 10.1016/s1357-4310(98)01222-2.
7
Icelandic health records.冰岛健康记录。
Science. 1998 Dec 11;282(5396):1993. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5396.1991e.
8
Canavan decision favors researchers over families.卡纳万案的裁决偏袒研究人员而非患者家庭。
J Law Med Ethics. 2003 Fall;31(3):450-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00108.x.
9
India fears patent and ethics abuses.印度担心专利和道德方面的滥用行为。
Nat Biotechnol. 1997 Jul;15(7):613. doi: 10.1038/nbt0797-613.

引用本文的文献

2
The Claims of Biospecimen Donors to Credit and Compensation.生物标本捐赠者的信用和补偿主张。
Trends Genet. 2020 Sep;36(9):630-632. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jul 10.

本文引用的文献

4
The ethics of benefit sharing.利益分享的伦理问题。
Clin Genet. 2001 Apr;59(4):240-3. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2001.590404.x.
5
Genetic disease since 1945.1945年以来的遗传疾病。
Nat Rev Genet. 2000 Dec;1(3):236-41. doi: 10.1038/35042097.
10
Conflict of interest and the public trust.利益冲突与公众信任。
JAMA. 2000 Nov 1;284(17):2237-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.17.2237.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验