Kozlowski L T, O'Connor R J
Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):I40-50. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i40.
To review tobacco industry documents on filter ventilation in light of published studies and to explore the role of filter ventilation in the design of cigarettes that deliver higher smoke yields to smokers than would be expected from standard machine smoked tests (Federal Trade Commission (FTC), International Organization for Standardization (ISO)).
Searched from November 1999 to November 2000 internet databases of industry documents (www.pmdocs.com, www.rjrtdocs.com, www.lorillarddocs.com, www.bw.aalatg.com, www.cdc.gov/tobacco/industrydocs, www.tobaccodocuments.org, www.tobaccopapers.org, www.hlth.gov.bc.ca/Guildford, www.cctc.ca/ncth/Guildford, www.cctc.ca/ncth/Guildford2) for documents related to filter ventilation. Documents found dated from 1955 through 1994.
Those documents judged to contain the most relevant information or data on filter ventilation related to cigarette taste and compensatory smoking, while also trying to avoid redundancy from various documents deriving from the same underlying data.
Filter ventilation is a crucial design feature creating three main problems for lower tar cigarettes as measured by official smoking machine testing. Firstly, it misleadingly makes cigarettes taste lighter and milder, and, therefore, they appear less dangerous to smokers. Secondly, it promotes compensation mainly by facilitating the taking of larger puffs. Thirdly, for very heavily ventilated cigarettes (that is, > 65% filter air dilution), behavioural blocking of vents with lips or fingers is an additional contributor to compensatory smoking. These three effects are found in industry research as well as published research.
Filter ventilation is a dangerous, defective technology that should be abandoned in less hazardous nicotine delivery systems. Health interested groups should test cigarettes in a way that reflects compensatory smoking. Lower tar (vented filter) cigarettes should be actively countermarketed.
根据已发表的研究回顾烟草行业关于过滤嘴通风的文件,并探讨过滤嘴通风在设计向吸烟者输送比标准机器抽吸测试(联邦贸易委员会(FTC)、国际标准化组织(ISO))预期更高烟雾量的香烟中的作用。
那些被认为包含与香烟口味和补偿性吸烟相关的过滤嘴通风最相关信息或数据的文件,同时也尽量避免来自相同基础数据的各种文件的冗余。
过滤嘴通风是一个关键的设计特征,对于通过官方吸烟机测试测量的低焦油香烟造成了三个主要问题。首先,它误导性地使香烟尝起来更淡更温和,因此,对吸烟者来说它们看起来危险性更低。其次,它主要通过促进吸更大口来促进补偿。第三,对于通风非常强的香烟(即过滤嘴空气稀释>65%),用嘴唇或手指对通风口的行为性堵塞是补偿性吸烟的另一个因素。这三种影响在行业研究以及已发表的研究中都有发现。
过滤嘴通风是一种危险、有缺陷的技术,应在危害较小的尼古丁输送系统中摒弃。关注健康的团体应以反映补偿性吸烟的方式测试香烟。应积极抵制低焦油(通风过滤嘴)香烟。