• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

错误记忆与差异归因假说:原型熟悉度错觉

False memory and the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: the prototype-familiarity illusion.

作者信息

Whittlesea Bruce W A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Mar;131(1):96-115. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.131.1.96.

DOI:10.1037//0096-3445.131.1.96
PMID:11902153
Abstract

According to the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis (B. W. A. Whittlesea & L. D. Williams, 1998), people experience a feeling of familiarity when they perceive their processing to be surprising, but for an indefinite reason. This hypothesis has been successful in explaining several illusions of familiarity. Here, it is applied to the prototype-familiarity effect, an illusion of remembering that occurs when people are shown prototype words after studying lists of associates. The experiments showed that studying associates enhances semantic, but not perceptual, processing of prototypes. They also showed that claims of recognizing prototypes can be modified by presenting them in predictive or incongruous contexts at test. The evidence suggests that the effect results from an evaluation process that monitors the coherence of processing.

摘要

根据差异归因假说(B. W. A. 惠特利西和L. D. 威廉姆斯,1998年),当人们察觉到自己的加工过程令人惊讶但原因不明时,就会体验到一种熟悉感。这一假说成功地解释了几种熟悉感错觉。在此,它被应用于原型熟悉效应,即当人们在学习联想词列表后看到原型词时出现的一种记忆错觉。实验表明,学习联想词会增强对原型的语义加工,但不会增强感知加工。实验还表明,在测试时将原型呈现于预测性或不一致的情境中,可以改变对原型的识别判断。证据表明,这种效应源于一个监测加工连贯性的评估过程。

相似文献

1
False memory and the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: the prototype-familiarity illusion.错误记忆与差异归因假说:原型熟悉度错觉
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Mar;131(1):96-115. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.131.1.96.
2
The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity.差异归因假说:II. 期望、不确定性、惊讶与熟悉感
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jan;27(1):14-33.
3
The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity.差异归因假说:I. 熟悉感的启发式基础。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jan;27(1):3-13.
4
Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity.为什么陌生人会让人感觉熟悉,而朋友却不会?关于熟悉感的差异归因解释。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1998 Apr;98(2-3):141-65. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(97)00040-1.
5
The source of feelings of familiarity: the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis.熟悉感的来源:差异归因假说。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 May;26(3):547-65. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.3.547.
6
False memory following rapidly presented lists: the element of surprise.快速呈现列表后的错误记忆:惊喜元素
Psychol Res. 2005 Jun;69(5-6):420-30. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0213-1. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
7
Illusory recollection and dual-process models of recognition memory.错误记忆与识别记忆的双加工模型
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2004 May;57(4):714-44. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000468.
8
Remembering after a perception of discrepancy: out with the old, in with the two.在察觉到差异后进行记忆:摒弃旧有,接纳二元。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Sep;32(5):1174-84. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1174.
9
Two routes to remembering (and another to remembering not).记忆的两条途径(以及另一条不记忆的途径)。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Sep;131(3):325-48. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.131.3.325.
10
False recognition across meaning, language, and stimulus format: conceptual relatedness and the feeling of familiarity.跨语义、语言和刺激形式的错误识别:概念关联性与熟悉感。
Mem Cognit. 2005 Mar;33(2):249-60. doi: 10.3758/bf03195314.

引用本文的文献

1
A reduction in self-reported confidence accompanies the recall of memories distorted by prototypes.随着对被原型扭曲的记忆的回忆,自我报告的信心会降低。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Jul 1;2(1):58. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00108-2.
2
Eyes on Memory: Pupillometry in Encoding and Retrieval.聚焦记忆:编码与检索过程中的瞳孔测量法
Vision (Basel). 2024 Jun 14;8(2):37. doi: 10.3390/vision8020037.
3
Information perseveration in recognition memory: Examining the scope of sequential dependencies.再认记忆中的信息固着:检验序列依赖性的范围。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Feb;53(2):517-535. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01582-z. Epub 2024 May 9.
4
Pupil response patterns distinguish true from false memories.瞳孔反应模式可区分真实记忆和虚假记忆。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 11;13(1):17244. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44362-6.
5
Subjective consistency increases trust.主观一致性增加信任。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 6;13(1):5657. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32034-4.
6
Expectation affects learning and modulates memory experience at retrieval.期望会影响学习,并在检索时调节记忆体验。
Cognition. 2018 Nov;180:123-134. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
7
Disfluent presentations lead to the creation of more false memories.不流畅的表述会导致产生更多错误记忆。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):e0191735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191735. eCollection 2018.
8
Preference for facial averageness: Evidence for a common mechanism in human and macaque infants.对面孔平均性的偏好:人类和猕猴婴儿中共同机制的证据。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 13;7:46303. doi: 10.1038/srep46303.
9
False memory susceptibility in coma survivors with and without a near-death experience.有或没有濒死体验的昏迷幸存者的虚假记忆易感性
Psychol Res. 2018 Jul;82(4):806-818. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0855-9. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
10
The neurocognitive basis of borrowed context information.借用情境信息的神经认知基础。
Cortex. 2017 Jun;91:89-100. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.01.014. Epub 2017 Jan 30.