• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么陌生人会让人感觉熟悉,而朋友却不会?关于熟悉感的差异归因解释。

Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity.

作者信息

Whittlesea B W, Williams L D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 1998 Apr;98(2-3):141-65. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(97)00040-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0001-6918(97)00040-1
PMID:9621828
Abstract

Recent articles on familiarity (e.g. Whittlesea, B.W.A, 1993. Journal of Experimental Psychology 19, 1235) have argued that the feeling of familiarity is produced by unconscious attribution of fluent processing to a source in the past. In this article, we refine that notion: We argue that is not fluency per se, but rather fluent processing occurring under unexpected circumstances that produces the feeling. We demonstrate cases in which moderately fluent processing produces more familiarity than does highly fluent processing, at least when the former is surprising.

摘要

近期关于熟悉感的文章(例如,惠特利西,B.W.A,1993年。《实验心理学杂志》第19卷,第1235页)认为,熟悉感是由对流畅加工下意识地归因于过去的某个来源而产生的。在本文中,我们对这一观点进行了细化:我们认为,产生这种感觉的并非流畅性本身,而是在意外情况下发生的流畅加工。我们证明了,至少在前者令人惊讶的情况下,适度流畅的加工比高度流畅的加工会产生更多的熟悉感。

相似文献

1
Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity.为什么陌生人会让人感觉熟悉,而朋友却不会?关于熟悉感的差异归因解释。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1998 Apr;98(2-3):141-65. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(97)00040-1.
2
The source of feelings of familiarity: the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis.熟悉感的来源:差异归因假说。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 May;26(3):547-65. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.3.547.
3
False memory and the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: the prototype-familiarity illusion.错误记忆与差异归因假说:原型熟悉度错觉
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Mar;131(1):96-115. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.131.1.96.
4
The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity.差异归因假说:I. 熟悉感的启发式基础。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jan;27(1):3-13.
5
The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity.差异归因假说:II. 期望、不确定性、惊讶与熟悉感
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jan;27(1):14-33.
6
Conceptually driven encoding episodes create perceptual misattributions.概念驱动的编码过程会导致感知错误归因。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1998 Apr;98(2-3):183-210. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(97)00042-5.
7
On the relationship between recognition familiarity and perceptual fluency: evidence for distinct mnemonic processes.关于识别熟悉度与知觉流畅性之间的关系:不同记忆过程的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1998 Apr;98(2-3):211-30. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(97)00043-7.
8
Separating Event-related Potential Effects for Conceptual Fluency and Episodic Familiarity.分离概念流畅性和情景熟悉度的事件相关电位效应。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Aug;29(8):1402-1414. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01131. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
9
False recognition across meaning, language, and stimulus format: conceptual relatedness and the feeling of familiarity.跨语义、语言和刺激形式的错误识别:概念关联性与熟悉感。
Mem Cognit. 2005 Mar;33(2):249-60. doi: 10.3758/bf03195314.
10
A rose in any other font would not smell as sweet: effects of perceptual fluency on categorization.换用任何其他字体的玫瑰都不会闻起来那么香:知觉流畅性对分类的影响。
Cognition. 2008 Mar;106(3):1178-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.010. Epub 2007 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Natural color composition induces oddball P3 asymmetry associated with processing fluency.自然颜色成分会诱发与加工流畅性相关的失匹配负波P3不对称性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 10;15(1):4878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88815-6.
2
Metacognitive Feelings: A Predictive-Processing Perspective.元认知情感:一种预测加工视角
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Jan 29:17456916231221976. doi: 10.1177/17456916231221976.
3
Fluency, prediction and motivation: how processing dynamics, expectations and epistemic goals shape aesthetic judgements.流畅度、预测和动机:处理动态、期望和认识目标如何塑造审美判断。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan 29;379(1895):20230326. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0326. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
4
Easy to process, hard to control: Transient and sustained processing fluency impairs cognitive control adjustments to conflict.易于加工,难以控制:瞬态和持续加工流畅性损害了对冲突进行认知控制调整的能力。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Nov;76(11):2524-2534. doi: 10.1177/17470218231159787. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
5
Experience of memory: transfer of the motor feeling of fluency linked to our interaction with the environment.体验记忆:流畅运动感觉的转移与我们与环境的互动有关。
Psychol Res. 2023 Sep;87(6):1753-1760. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01759-8. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
6
The subjective feeling of a gap between conceptual and perceptual fluency is interpreted as a metacognitive signal of pastness.概念流畅性和感知流畅性之间存在差距的主观感觉被解释为过去的元认知信号。
Cogn Process. 2023 Feb;24(1):83-94. doi: 10.1007/s10339-022-01114-0. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
7
Affectivism about intuitions.直觉情感主义。
Synthese. 2022;200(4):274. doi: 10.1007/s11229-022-03749-0. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
8
Bad after bad is good: previous trial disfluency reduces interference promoted by incongruence.祸不单行亦为福:先前试验的不流畅性减少了由不一致性引发的干扰。
Psychol Res. 2022 Oct;86(7):2215-2224. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01626-y. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
9
Associative and Identity Words Promote the Speed of Visual Categorization: A Hierarchical Drift Diffusion Account.联想词和识别词促进视觉分类速度:一种分层漂移扩散模型解释
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 23;11:955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00955. eCollection 2020.
10
Toward Empirical Evidence for Teachers' Mental Representations of Dyadic Relationships With Students: Two Priming Experiments.探寻教师对师生二元关系心理表征的实证证据:两项启动实验
Psychol Belg. 2019 May 9;59(1):156-176. doi: 10.5334/pb.471.