• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在社区健康背景下,运用参与式行动研究框架开展博士研究。

Doing a doctorate using a participatory action research framework in the context of community health.

作者信息

Gibbon Marion

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Guy's King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2002 Apr;12(4):546-58. doi: 10.1177/104973202129120061.

DOI:10.1177/104973202129120061
PMID:11939253
Abstract

The use of participatory action research (PAR) for doctoral research in a health setting is still a fairly rare phenomenon. The author explores what is meant by PAR and examines some of the obstacles to undertaking PAR for doctoral research so that these constraints can be overcome. The barriers are seen in terms of methodological conflicting interests, timing, and the information generated. There are also institutional obstacles. The author expresses the viewpoint that it is essential for academic institutions to consider how to minimize such obstacles for students to be able to engage in PAR in a meaningful way.

摘要

在健康领域将参与式行动研究(PAR)用于博士研究仍是一种相当罕见的现象。作者探讨了PAR的含义,并审视了在博士研究中开展PAR的一些障碍,以便能够克服这些限制。这些障碍体现在方法上的利益冲突、时间安排以及所产生的信息方面。还存在制度性障碍。作者表达了这样的观点,即学术机构必须考虑如何将此类障碍降至最低,以使学生能够以有意义的方式参与PAR。

相似文献

1
Doing a doctorate using a participatory action research framework in the context of community health.在社区健康背景下,运用参与式行动研究框架开展博士研究。
Qual Health Res. 2002 Apr;12(4):546-58. doi: 10.1177/104973202129120061.
2
Ethical dilemmas in participatory action research: a case study from the disability community.参与式行动研究中的伦理困境:来自残疾人群体的案例研究
Health Educ Behav. 2002 Feb;29(1):14-29. doi: 10.1177/109019810202900104.
3
Lessons learned from undertaking community-based participatory research dissertations: the trials and triumphs of two junior health scholars.从开展基于社区的参与性研究论文中吸取的经验教训:两位初级健康学者的试验与成功
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2010 Winter;4(4):347-56. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2010.0019.
4
From rhetoric to action: establishing community participation in AIDS-related research.从言辞到行动:建立社区对艾滋病相关研究的参与
Can J Nurs Res. 1998 Spring;30(1):137-52.
5
The use and abuse of participatory action research.参与式行动研究的运用与滥用
Chronic Dis Can. 1997;18(1):1-4.
6
University strategy for doctoral training: the Ghent University Doctoral Schools.大学博士培养战略:根特大学博士学院
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2010;75(1):31-7.
7
Reducing diabetes health disparities through community-based participatory action research: the Chicago Southeast Diabetes Community Action Coalition.通过基于社区的参与性行动研究减少糖尿病健康差异:芝加哥东南部糖尿病社区行动联盟
Public Health Rep. 2003 Jul-Aug;118(4):309-23. doi: 10.1093/phr/118.4.309.
8
Teaching public health through a pedagogy of collegiality.通过合作教学法教授公共卫生。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Jul;96(7):1175-80. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.062950. Epub 2006 May 30.
9
Overcoming barriers to effective community-based participatory research in US medical schools.克服美国医学院有效开展基于社区的参与性研究的障碍。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2004 Jul;17(2):141-51. doi: 10.1080/13576280410001710969.
10
Standardization of doctoral study in agricultural and extension education: is the field of study mature enough for achievement of the optimum degree of order?农业与推广教育博士研究的标准化:该研究领域是否足够成熟以实现最佳程度的秩序?
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2010;75(1):153-73.

引用本文的文献

1
The Blossom Gang: co-producing research on FGM with second-generation young people in the UK.“绽放团伙”:与英国第二代年轻人共同开展关于女性生殖器切割的研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Aug 16;9(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00457-y.
2
Trainee-led research using an integrated knowledge translation or other research partnership approaches: a scoping reviews.以学员为主导的研究采用综合知识转化或其他研究伙伴关系方法:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Nov 2;19(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00784-0.
3
Listening to the views of people affected by cancer about cancer research: an example of participatory research in setting the cancer research agenda.
倾听癌症患者对癌症研究的看法:参与式研究在设定癌症研究议程中的一个实例
Health Expect. 2006 Mar;9(1):3-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00353.x.