• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公开图片命名中的语义类别干扰:通过主成分分析锐化电流密度定位

Semantic category interference in overt picture naming: sharpening current density localization by PCA.

作者信息

Maess Burkhard, Friederici Angela D, Damian Markus, Meyer Antje S, Levelt Willem J M

机构信息

Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, P.O. Box 500 355, D-04303 Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Apr 1;14(3):455-62. doi: 10.1162/089892902317361967.

DOI:10.1162/089892902317361967
PMID:11970804
Abstract

The study investigated the neuronal basis of the retrieval of words from the mental lexicon. The semantic category interference effect was used to locate lexical retrieval processes in time and space. This effect reflects the finding that, for overt naming, volunteers are slower when naming pictures out of a sequence of items from the same semantic category than from different categories. Participants named pictures blockwise either in the context of same- or mixed-category items while the brain response was registered using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Fifteen out of 20 participants showed longer response latencies in the same-category compared to the mixed-category condition. Event-related MEG signals for the participants demonstrating the interference effect were submitted to a current source density (CSD) analysis. As a new approach, a principal component analysis was applied to decompose the grand average CSD distribution into spatial subcomponents (factors). The spatial factor indicating left temporal activity revealed significantly different activation for the same-category compared to the mixed-category condition in the time window between 150 and 225 msec post picture onset. These findings indicate a major involvement of the left temporal cortex in the semantic interference effect. As this effect has been shown to take place at the level of lexical selection, the data suggest that the left temporal cortex supports processes of lexical retrieval during production.

摘要

该研究调查了从心理词典中检索单词的神经基础。语义类别干扰效应被用于在时间和空间上定位词汇检索过程。这种效应反映了这样一个发现,即对于公开命名,当志愿者从同一语义类别的一系列项目中命名图片时,比从不同类别中命名图片的速度要慢。参与者在同一类别或混合类别的项目背景下逐块命名图片,同时使用脑磁图(MEG)记录大脑反应。20名参与者中有15名在同一类别条件下的反应潜伏期比混合类别条件下更长。对表现出干扰效应的参与者的事件相关MEG信号进行了电流源密度(CSD)分析。作为一种新方法,应用主成分分析将总体平均CSD分布分解为空间子成分(因子)。表明左颞叶活动的空间因子显示,在图片呈现后150至225毫秒的时间窗口内,同一类别条件与混合类别条件相比,激活存在显著差异。这些发现表明左颞叶皮层在语义干扰效应中起主要作用。由于这种效应已被证明发生在词汇选择层面,数据表明左颞叶皮层在生成过程中支持词汇检索过程。

相似文献

1
Semantic category interference in overt picture naming: sharpening current density localization by PCA.公开图片命名中的语义类别干扰:通过主成分分析锐化电流密度定位
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Apr 1;14(3):455-62. doi: 10.1162/089892902317361967.
2
Semantic context and visual feature effects in object naming: an fMRI study using arterial spin labeling.物体命名中的语义语境和视觉特征效应:一项使用动脉自旋标记的功能磁共振成像研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Aug;21(8):1571-83. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21114.
3
Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.与显性命名中语义和 Stroop 样干扰效应相关的事件相关电位和振荡脑反应。
Brain Res. 2012 Apr 23;1450:87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.050. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
4
Interference and facilitation in overt speech production investigated with event-related potentials.通过事件相关电位研究公开言语产生中的干扰与促进作用。
Neuroreport. 2008 Aug 6;19(12):1227-30. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328309ecd1.
5
The costs of emotional attention: affective processing inhibits subsequent lexico-semantic analysis.情感注意力的代价:情感加工会抑制后续的词汇语义分析。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Dec;19(12):1932-49. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.1932.
6
Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture-word interference task: implications for theories of lexical access in speech production.干扰模态可在图片-词汇干扰任务中将语义干扰转化为语义促进:对言语产生中词汇通达理论的启示。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1443-53. doi: 10.1037/a0017020.
7
Localization of syntactic and semantic brain responses using magnetoencephalography.利用脑磁图对句法和语义脑反应进行定位。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jul;19(7):1193-205. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1193.
8
Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.词汇选择并非通过竞争:对图片-单词干扰范式中语义干扰和促进效应的重新诠释。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):503-35. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503.
9
Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?延迟命名是否存在语义干扰?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):522-38. doi: 10.1037/a0021970.
10
N400-like semantic incongruity effect in 19-month-olds: processing known words in picture contexts.19个月大婴儿的类N400语义不一致效应:在图片情境中处理已知词汇
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Oct;16(8):1465-77. doi: 10.1162/0898929042304705.

引用本文的文献

1
Asynchronous behavioral and neurophysiological changes in word production in the adult lifespan.成人寿命中单词产生的异步行为和神经生理变化。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 May 2;34(5). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae187.
2
Adaptive lexical processing of semantic competitors extends to alternative names: Evidence from blocked-cyclic picture naming.语义竞争者的适应性词汇加工扩展至别名:来自阻断循环图片命名的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Apr;78(4):672-684. doi: 10.1177/17470218241245107. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
3
Dynamics of Word Production in the Transition from Adolescence to Adulthood.
从青春期到成年期过渡过程中词汇生成的动态变化
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2020 Nov 1;2(1):1-21. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00024. eCollection 2021.
4
Reinvestigating the Neural Bases Involved in Speech Production of Stutterers: An ALE Meta-Analysis.重新探究口吃者言语产生所涉及的神经基础:一项激活可能性估计元分析
Brain Sci. 2022 Aug 3;12(8):1030. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12081030.
5
Tracking lexical access and code switching in multilingual participants with different degrees of simultaneous interpretation expertise.追踪具有不同同声传译专业程度的多语言参与者的词汇通达和语码转换。
Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Sep;56(6):4869-4888. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15786. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
6
The Time Course of Language Production as Revealed by Pattern Classification of MEG Sensor Data.基于脑磁图传感器数据的模式分类揭示语言产生的时程。
J Neurosci. 2022 Jul 20;42(29):5745-5754. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1923-21.2022. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
7
Taxonomic and thematic semantic relationships in picture naming as revealed by Laplacian-transformed event-related potentials.拉普拉斯变换事件相关电位揭示的图片命名中的分类和主题语义关系。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Nov;59(11):e14091. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14091. Epub 2022 May 12.
8
Morphology in a Parallel, Distributed, Interactive Architecture of Language Production.语言生成的并行、分布式、交互式架构中的形态学
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Mar 3;5:803259. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.803259. eCollection 2022.
9
First Language Attrition: What It Is, What It Isn't, and What It Can Be.母语 attrition:它是什么,不是什么,以及可能成为什么。 (注:这里“attrition”常见释义为“磨损;消耗;人员损耗”等,结合语境可能需要根据专业知识进一步准确理解其含义,比如在语言相关领域可能有“语言磨蚀”等意思 )
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Sep 7;15:686388. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.686388. eCollection 2021.
10
Visual working memory for semantically related objects in healthy adults.健康成年人对语义相关物体的视觉工作记忆。
Rev Neurol. 2020 Oct 16;71(8):277-284. doi: 10.33588/rn.7108.2019479.