Suppr超能文献

间接免疫荧光抗体试验作为检测肺炎衣原体抗体的筛查方法。

Inclusion fluorescent-antibody test as a screening assay for detection of antibodies to Chlamydia pneumoniae.

作者信息

Tapia Olga, Slepenkin Anatoly, Sevrioukov Evgueni, Hamor Kathi, de la Maza Luis M, Peterson Ellena M

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-4800, USA.

出版信息

Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002 May;9(3):562-7. doi: 10.1128/cdli.9.3.562-567.2002.

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine the ability of the inclusion immunofluorescence assay (inclusion IFA) to act as a screening test to detect samples with antibodies to Chlamydia pneumoniae; microimmunofluorescence (MIF) was used as the "gold standard." In addition, the inclusion IFA was compared using HEp-2 cells infected with either C. pneumoniae CM-1 or Chlamydia trachomatis serovar E. A total of 331 serum samples representing a range of MIF titers were evaluated. The sensitivities of the inclusion IFA for detecting samples with C. pneumoniae MIF titers of > or = 16 were 96.9 and 74.8% with C. pneumoniae- and C. trachomatis-infected cells, respectively. For samples with an elevated C. pneumoniae MIF titer of > or = 512, the sensitivities of the C. pneumoniae- and C. trachomatis-based inclusion IFA were 97.0 and 8.8%, respectively. These results suggest that the inclusion IFA is not a genus-specific test, as evidenced by the failure of the C. trachomatis-infected cells to detect a significant number of samples with C. pneumoniae antibodies. Samples that had elevated C. pneumoniae inclusion IFA and MIF titers but that were found negative (titer, <16) by the C. trachomatis inclusion IFA were further tested by an in vitro neutralization assay for functional antibodies that might not have been detected by the serological assays. The in vitro neutralization results corroborated the serological results in that all seven sera tested had a neutralization titer for C. pneumoniae (range, 20 to 225), while all but one failed to have any effect on the infectivity of C. trachomatis serovar E. While the C. pneumoniae inclusion IFA had a high sensitivity for detecting chlamydial antibodies, depending on whether it was used as a screening test for detecting samples with low (> or = 16) or elevated (> or = 512) MIF titers, its specificity ranged from 53.4 to 77.1%. In conclusion, the inclusion IFA with C. pneumoniae-infected cells was best suited as a sensitive screening test for identifying specimens with elevated MIF titers (those associated with a possible acute infection with C. pneumoniae).

摘要

开展了一项研究,以确定包涵体免疫荧光测定法(包涵体免疫荧光测定)作为筛查试验检测肺炎衣原体抗体样本的能力;微量免疫荧光法(MIF)用作“金标准”。此外,使用感染肺炎衣原体CM-1或沙眼衣原体血清型E的HEp-2细胞对包涵体免疫荧光测定进行比较。共评估了331份代表一系列MIF滴度的血清样本。对于检测肺炎衣原体MIF滴度≥16的样本,使用肺炎衣原体感染细胞和沙眼衣原体感染细胞时,包涵体免疫荧光测定的灵敏度分别为96.9%和74.8%。对于肺炎衣原体MIF滴度≥512的升高样本,基于肺炎衣原体和沙眼衣原体的包涵体免疫荧光测定的灵敏度分别为97.0%和8.8%。这些结果表明,包涵体免疫荧光测定不是属特异性试验,沙眼衣原体感染细胞未能检测到大量肺炎衣原体抗体样本即证明了这一点。肺炎衣原体包涵体免疫荧光测定和MIF滴度升高但沙眼衣原体包涵体免疫荧光测定呈阴性(滴度<16)的样本,通过体外中和试验进一步检测可能未被血清学检测法检测到的功能性抗体。体外中和结果证实了血清学结果,即所有检测的7份血清对肺炎衣原体均有中和滴度(范围为20至225),而除1份血清外,所有血清对沙眼衣原体血清型E的感染性均无影响。虽然肺炎衣原体包涵体免疫荧光测定在检测衣原体抗体方面具有较高灵敏度,但根据其用作检测低(≥16)或升高(≥512)MIF滴度样本的筛查试验,其特异性范围为53.4%至77.1%。总之,使用肺炎衣原体感染细胞的包涵体免疫荧光测定最适合作为一种灵敏的筛查试验,用于识别MIF滴度升高(与可能的肺炎衣原体急性感染相关)的标本。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Microbiology. Do chronic diseases have an infectious root?微生物学。慢性病是否有感染性根源?
Science. 2001 Sep 14;293(5537):1974-7. doi: 10.1126/science.293.5537.1974.
9
WIZARD and the design of trials for secondary prevention of atherosclerosis with antibiotics.
Am Heart J. 1999 Nov;138(5 Pt 2):S542-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70297-8.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验