• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同自锁托槽在干燥和唾液状态下伴有二阶角度时的抗滑动阻力比较。

Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states.

作者信息

Thorstenson Glenys A, Kusy Robert P

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 May;121(5):472-82. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.121562.

DOI:10.1067/mod.2002.121562
PMID:12045765
Abstract

Resistance to sliding was investigated for 3 self-ligating brackets having passive slides and 3 self-ligating brackets having active clips. Four of these products are currently marketed, and 2 are of historic interest. For all cases, an 0.018 x 0.025-in stainless steel archwire was drawn through each bracket at a rate of 10 mm/min over a distance of 2.5 mm. For each bracket, the resistances to sliding were measured at 14 second-order angulations, which ranged from -9 degrees to +9 degrees. Both the dry and the wet (human saliva) states were evaluated at 34 degrees C. From dimensional measurements, the critical contact angles for binding were determined for all products and ranged from 3 degrees to 5 degrees. Below each characteristic critical angle, brackets with passive slides exhibited negligible friction; brackets with active clips exhibited frictional forces as great as 50 cN (50 g). Above each critical angle, all brackets had elastic binding forces that increased at similar rates as angulation increased and were independent of bracket design. Generally speaking, at second-order angulations that exceeded the critical angle, brackets with active clips that had a low critical angle had more resistance to sliding than did brackets with active clips that had a higher critical angle. Brackets with passive slides that had a high critical angle exhibited the lowest resistance to sliding, but could do so at a cost of some loss of control. Nonetheless, self-ligating brackets represent a compromise between friction and control; ie, self-ligating brackets produce frictional forces that are more reproducible than do conventionally ligated stainless steel brackets but without the potential control problems associated with Begg-style brackets.

摘要

对3种带有被动滑动装置的自锁托槽和3种带有主动夹的自锁托槽的滑动阻力进行了研究。这些产品中有4种目前正在市场上销售,2种具有历史研究价值。对于所有情况,将一根0.018×0.025英寸的不锈钢弓丝以10毫米/分钟的速度穿过每个托槽,移动距离为2.5毫米。对于每个托槽,在14种二级角度下测量滑动阻力,角度范围为-9度至+9度。在34摄氏度下评估了干燥和湿润(人唾液)状态。通过尺寸测量,确定了所有产品的结合临界接触角,范围为3度至5度。在每个特征临界角以下,带有被动滑动装置的托槽摩擦力可忽略不计;带有主动夹的托槽摩擦力高达50厘牛(50克)。在每个临界角以上,所有托槽都有弹性结合力,随着角度增加,其增加速率相似,且与托槽设计无关。一般来说,在超过临界角的二级角度下,临界角低的带有主动夹的托槽比临界角高的带有主动夹的托槽滑动阻力更大。临界角高的带有被动滑动装置的托槽滑动阻力最低,但可能会牺牲一些控制能力。尽管如此,自锁托槽代表了摩擦力和控制力之间的一种折衷;即,自锁托槽产生的摩擦力比传统结扎的不锈钢托槽更具可重复性,但没有与Begg式托槽相关的潜在控制问题。

相似文献

1
Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states.不同自锁托槽在干燥和唾液状态下伴有二阶角度时的抗滑动阻力比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 May;121(5):472-82. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.121562.
2
Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states.自结扎托槽与传统不锈钢双翼托槽在干燥和湿润(唾液)状态下带有二阶角度时的抗滑动性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Oct;120(4):361-70. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.116090.
3
Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state.在干燥状态下,弓丝尺寸和材料对具有二阶角度的自锁托槽滑动阻力的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Sep;122(3):295-305. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.126156.
4
Friction between various self-ligating brackets and archwire couples during sliding mechanics.滑动矫治力学过程中各种自锁托槽与弓丝组合之间的摩擦力。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Oct;138(4):463-467. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.029.
5
Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different second-order angulations: an in vitro study.结扎方法对不同二阶角度舌侧托槽摩擦力的影响:一项体外研究。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Jul-Aug;21(4):34-40. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.034-040.oar.
6
Resistance to sliding of titanium brackets tested against stainless steel and beta-titanium archwires with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.在干燥和潮湿状态下,针对带有二级角度的不锈钢和β钛弓丝测试钛托槽的滑动阻力。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Mar;131(3):400-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.019.
7
A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.自锁式与传统正畸托槽系统的比较。
Br J Orthod. 1997 Nov;24(4):309-17. doi: 10.1093/ortho/24.4.309.
8
Evaluation of titanium brackets for orthodontic treatment: Part II--The active configuration.正畸治疗用钛制托槽的评估:第二部分——活动构型
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Dec;118(6):675-84. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.97818.
9
Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets.与自锁托槽相关的摩擦力。
Eur J Orthod. 1998 Jun;20(3):283-91. doi: 10.1093/ejo/20.3.283.
10
Third-order torque and self-ligating orthodontic bracket-type effects on sliding friction.三阶扭矩和自锁正畸托槽类型对滑动摩擦的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2009 May;79(3):551-7. doi: 10.2319/022608-114.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of zirconium oxide nano-coating on frictional resistance of orthodontic wires.氧化锆纳米涂层对正畸弓丝摩擦力的影响。
J Orthod Sci. 2022 Aug 24;11:35. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_154_21. eCollection 2022.
2
Evaluation of Frictional Forces Generated between Three Different Ligation Methods with Four Different Sizes of Orthodontic Archwires: An Study.三种不同结扎方法与四种不同尺寸正畸弓丝之间产生的摩擦力评估:一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1434-S1441. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_244_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
3
Treatment of bimaxillary protrusion using intra- and extra-alveolar miniscrews associated to self-ligating brackets system.
使用与自锁托槽系统相关的牙槽内和牙槽外微型螺钉治疗双颌前突。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2020 Sep-Oct;25(5):66-84. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.25.5.066-084.sar.
4
Comparison of self-ligating Damon3 and conventional MBT brackets regarding alignment efficiency and pain experience: A randomized clinical trial.自锁托槽Damon3与传统MBT托槽在排齐效率和疼痛体验方面的比较:一项随机临床试验。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2019 Fall;13(4):281-288. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2019.043.
5
Oral health-related quality of life in orthodontic patients during initial therapy with conventional brackets or self-ligating brackets.使用传统托槽或自锁托槽进行初始治疗期间正畸患者的口腔健康相关生活质量
J Dent Sci. 2017 Jun;12(2):161-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
6
Comparison of force loss due to friction of different wire sizes and materials in conventional and new self-ligating orthodontic brackets during simulated canine retraction.模拟尖牙后移过程中,传统正畸托槽与新型自锁正畸托槽中不同尺寸和材料的弓丝摩擦力导致的力损失比较。
J Orofac Orthop. 2019 Mar;80(2):68-78. doi: 10.1007/s00056-019-00168-8. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
7
Effect of different combinations of bracket, archwire and ligature on resistance to sliding and axial rotational control during the first stage of orthodontic treatment: An study.不同托槽、弓丝和结扎丝组合对正畸治疗第一阶段滑动阻力和轴向旋转控制的影响:一项研究。
Korean J Orthod. 2019 Jan;49(1):21-31. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2019.49.1.21. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
8
Differences between active and passive self-ligating brackets for orthodontic treatment : Systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized clinical trials.正畸治疗中主动式和被动式自锁托槽的差异:基于随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Mar;78(2):121-128. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0059-8. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
9
Comparative evaluation of anchorage loss between self-ligating appliance and Conventional pre-adjusted edgewise appliance using sliding mechanics - A retrospective study.使用滑动机制对自锁矫治器与传统预成方丝弓矫治器之间的支抗丧失进行比较评估——一项回顾性研究。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2015 Dec;71(Suppl 2):S362-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
10
Effect of archwire qualities and bracket designs on the force systems during leveling of malaligned teeth.弓丝质量和托槽设计对不齐牙齿整平过程中力系统的影响。
J Orofac Orthop. 2015 Mar;76(2):129-38, 140-2. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0276-y.