• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟尖牙后移过程中,传统正畸托槽与新型自锁正畸托槽中不同尺寸和材料的弓丝摩擦力导致的力损失比较。

Comparison of force loss due to friction of different wire sizes and materials in conventional and new self-ligating orthodontic brackets during simulated canine retraction.

作者信息

El-Bialy Tarek, Alobeid Ahmad, Dirk Cornelius, Jäger Andreas, Keilig Ludger, Bourauel Christoph

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Oral Technology, School of Dentistry, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

J Orofac Orthop. 2019 Mar;80(2):68-78. doi: 10.1007/s00056-019-00168-8. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00056-019-00168-8
PMID:30758513
Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare force loss due to friction (Fr) during simulated canine retraction using different archwire dimensions and materials between conventional and new self-ligating brackets.

METHODS

The tested brackets were (1) conventional brackets (Victory series, GAC twin and FLI twin), (2) self-ligating brackets (Damon-Q, FLI-SL, new/improved FLI-SL (I FLI-SL), SPEED, GAC innovation (R) and Ortho Classic) and (3) a low-friction bracket (Synergy). All brackets had a 0.022″ slot size. The tested archwires were stainless steel (0.018″; 0.016″x0.022″; 0.017″x0.025″; 0.018″x0.025″ and 0.019″x0.025″); nickel titanium (NiTi; 0.016″x0.022″; 0.017″x0.025″; 0.018″x0.025″ and 0.019″x0.025″) and titanium molybdenum alloy (TMA; 0.016″x0.022″; 0.017″x0.025″; 0.018″x0.025″ and 0.019″x0.025″). Canine retraction was experimentally simulated in a biomechanical set-up using a NiTi coil spring that delivered a force of 1 N. The simulated retraction path was up to 4 mm. Force loss due to friction was compared between groups using the Welch t‑test.

RESULTS

Force loss due to friction increased with increasing archwire size. Also, TMA showed the highest and stainless steel the lowest force loss due to friction. FLI-SL brackets showed the lowest Fr (31%) and Ortho Classic showed the highest (67%).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing wire size generally showed increasing force loss due to friction. FLI-SL brackets showed the lowest, while Ortho Classic showed the highest friction.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较在模拟犬牙后移过程中,传统托槽和新型自锁托槽使用不同尺寸和材料的弓丝时,由于摩擦力(Fr)导致的力损失情况。

方法

测试的托槽包括:(1)传统托槽(Victory系列、GAC双丝弓托槽和FLI双丝弓托槽);(2)自锁托槽(Damon-Q、FLI-SL、新型/改进型FLI-SL(I FLI-SL)、SPEED、GAC innovation (R)和Ortho Classic);(3)低摩擦托槽(Synergy)。所有托槽的槽沟尺寸均为0.022英寸。测试的弓丝有不锈钢丝(0.018英寸;0.016英寸×0.022英寸;0.017英寸×0.025英寸;0.018英寸×0.025英寸和0.019英寸×0.025英寸);镍钛丝(NiTi;0.016英寸×0.022英寸;0.017英寸×0.025英寸;0.018英寸×0.025英寸和0.019英寸×0.025英寸)以及钛钼合金丝(TMA;0.016英寸×0.022英寸;0.017英寸×0.025英寸;0.018英寸×0.025英寸和0.019英寸×0.025英寸)。在生物力学装置中,使用能产生1N力的镍钛螺旋弹簧对犬牙后移进行实验模拟。模拟后移路径长达4mm。使用Welch t检验比较各组之间由于摩擦力导致的力损失。

结果

由于摩擦力导致的力损失随着弓丝尺寸的增加而增加。此外,TMA显示出最高的摩擦力导致的力损失,而不锈钢丝显示出最低的力损失。FLI-SL托槽显示出最低的Fr(31%),而Ortho Classic显示出最高的Fr(67%)。

结论

一般来说,弓丝尺寸增加会导致由于摩擦力引起的力损失增加。FLI-SL托槽显示出最低的摩擦力,而Ortho Classic显示出最高的摩擦力。

相似文献

1
Comparison of force loss due to friction of different wire sizes and materials in conventional and new self-ligating orthodontic brackets during simulated canine retraction.模拟尖牙后移过程中,传统正畸托槽与新型自锁正畸托槽中不同尺寸和材料的弓丝摩擦力导致的力损失比较。
J Orofac Orthop. 2019 Mar;80(2):68-78. doi: 10.1007/s00056-019-00168-8. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
2
Force loss in archwire-guided tooth movement of conventional and self-ligating brackets.传统托槽和自锁托槽在弓丝引导牙齿移动过程中的力值损耗
Eur J Orthod. 2014 Feb;36(1):31-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs110. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
3
Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.不同结扎系统的自锁托槽和传统托槽的摩擦行为
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Jul;77(4):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0035-3. Epub 2016 May 24.
4
An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.不同尺寸弓丝与传统不锈钢及自锁不锈钢托槽在多种托槽-弓丝组合方式下摩擦特性的体外评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Aug 1;18(8):660-664. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2102.
5
Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.使用10种托槽模型对传统托槽和自锁托槽进行摩擦力测试。
Angle Orthod. 2005 Nov;75(6):1041-5. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[1041:FOCASB]2.0.CO;2.
6
An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance.一项关于自锁托槽、低摩擦结扎丝和弓丝对摩擦力影响的体外研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Aug;29(4):390-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm007.
7
Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.舌侧托槽与唇侧托槽牙齿排齐效果的比较:一项体外研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2018 Nov 30;40(6):660-665. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy005.
8
Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.在使用传统托槽和自锁托槽进行复杂牙齿排齐过程中,弓丝横截面变化对力值水平的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Apr;147(4 Suppl):S101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.11.024.
9
Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.不锈钢和美观自锁托槽在各种托槽-弓丝组合中的摩擦力评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Oct;124(4):395-402. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00504-3.
10
Comparative assessment of frictional forces between differently designed esthetic brackets during simulated canine retraction.模拟犬牙后移过程中不同设计的美观托槽之间摩擦力的比较评估
J Orofac Orthop. 2023 Oct;84(Suppl 3):222-230. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00433-3. Epub 2022 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of archwire size on the rate of canine retraction in adult women : A randomized clinical trial.弓丝尺寸对成年女性犬齿后移速率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.1007/s00056-025-00577-y.
2
Evaluation of surface roughness, cytotoxicity, and antibacterial effects of silver nanoparticle coating on copper nickel titanium orthodontic arch wires - study.银纳米颗粒涂层对铜镍钛正畸弓丝表面粗糙度、细胞毒性及抗菌效果的评估——研究
J Orthod Sci. 2024 Sep 17;13:31. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_29_24. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparative evaluation of different debonding and reconditioning methods for orthodontic ceramic brackets regarding effectiveness for reuse : An in vitro study.

本文引用的文献

1
An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.不同尺寸弓丝与传统不锈钢及自锁不锈钢托槽在多种托槽-弓丝组合方式下摩擦特性的体外评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Aug 1;18(8):660-664. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2102.
2
Evaluation of deflection forces of orthodontic wires with different ligation types.不同结扎类型正畸丝的挠曲力评估。
Braz Oral Res. 2017 Jul 3;31:e49. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0049.
3
Effect of CO laser power intensity on the surface morphology and friction behavior of alumina ceramic brackets.
正畸陶瓷托槽不同脱粘和修复方法再利用效果的比较评估:一项体外研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Jan;86(1):11-23. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00469-z. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
4
Effect of Different Forms of Fluoride Application on Surface Roughness of Rhodium-Coated NiTi Orthodontic Wires: A Clinical Trial.不同氟化物应用形式对镀铑镍钛正畸丝表面粗糙度的影响:一项临床试验
Front Dent. 2023 May 7;20:13. doi: 10.18502/fid.v20i13.12660. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparative assessment of frictional forces between differently designed esthetic brackets during simulated canine retraction.模拟犬牙后移过程中不同设计的美观托槽之间摩擦力的比较评估
J Orofac Orthop. 2023 Oct;84(Suppl 3):222-230. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00433-3. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
6
Friction Force Adjustment by an Innovative Covering System Applied with Superelastic NiTi Brackets and Wires-An In-Vitro Study.一种应用超弹性镍钛合金托槽和弓丝的创新覆盖系统对摩擦力的调节——一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jun 15;15(12):4248. doi: 10.3390/ma15124248.
7
Canine root/cortical bone relation (CRCR) and the orthodontic tooth movement.犬齿根/皮质骨关系(CRCR)与正畸牙齿移动。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 23;12(1):10714. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14663-3.
8
Friction behavior of the wire material Gummetal®.Gummetal®线材的摩擦行为。
J Orofac Orthop. 2022 Jan;83(1):59-72. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00317-y. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
9
Influence of a Lubricating Gel (Orthospeed®) on Pain and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Orthodontic Patients during Initial Therapy with Conventional and Low-Friction Brackets: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.一种润滑凝胶(Orthospeed®)对正畸患者在使用传统和低摩擦托槽进行初始治疗期间疼痛及口腔健康相关生活质量的影响:一项前瞻性随机临床试验
J Clin Med. 2020 May 14;9(5):1474. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051474.
CO激光功率强度对氧化铝陶瓷托槽表面形貌及摩擦行为的影响
Microsc Res Tech. 2017 Aug;80(8):923-929. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22883. Epub 2017 May 3.
4
In vitro evaluation of the influence of velocity on sliding resistance of stainless steel arch wires in a self-ligating orthodontic bracket.体外评估速度对自锁正畸托槽中不锈钢弓丝滑动阻力的影响。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 May;20(2):119-125. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12156.
5
Comparison of the force levels among labial and lingual self-ligating and conventional brackets in simulated misaligned teeth.模拟牙齿不齐情况下唇侧和舌侧自锁托槽与传统托槽之间力水平的比较。
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Aug 1;39(4):419-425. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjw082.
6
Comparison of friction forces between stainless orthodontic steel brackets and TiNi wires in wet and dry conditions.不锈钢正畸托槽与钛镍丝在干湿条件下摩擦力的比较。
Int Orthod. 2017 Mar;15(1):13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2016.12.017. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
7
Force loss in archwire-guided tooth movement of conventional and self-ligating brackets.传统托槽和自锁托槽在弓丝引导牙齿移动过程中的力值损耗
Eur J Orthod. 2014 Feb;36(1):31-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs110. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
8
Friction and anchorage loading revisited.摩擦与锚固负荷再探讨。
Orthodontics (Chic.). 2012;13(1):200-9.
9
Frictional resistance in self-ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets. A systematic review.自锁正畸托槽与传统结扎托槽的摩擦阻力。一项系统评价。
Angle Orthod. 2009 May;79(3):592-601. doi: 10.2319/060208-288.1.
10
Friction and resistance to sliding in orthodontics: a critical review.正畸学中的摩擦力与滑动阻力:一项批判性综述
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Apr;135(4):442-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.023.