Suppr超能文献

边缘性诊断I:精神病理学、共病性和人格结构

The borderline diagnosis I: psychopathology, comorbidity, and personality structure.

作者信息

Skodol Andrew E, Gunderson John G, Pfohl Bruce, Widiger Thomas A, Livesley W John, Siever Larry J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Jun 15;51(12):936-50. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01324-0.

Abstract

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a complex and serious mental disorder associated with severe functional impairment, substantial treatment utilization, and a high rate of mortality by suicide. Recently, BPD has become a focus of intensifying study. In Part I of this three-part article meant to provide a foundation to researchers on the current status of the borderline diagnosis and prospects for its future development, we examine the psychopathology, comorbidity, and personality structure of BPD. Although the descriptive characteristics of BPD are well-represented by DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, other important aspects of BPD psychopathology are not included. The descriptive criteria in conjunction with semistructured interviews have, however, increased the ability of investigators to diagnose BPD as reliably as many Axis I disorders. Frequent comorbidity of BPD with Axis I disorders necessitates a broad assessment of psychopathology to help account for clinical heterogeneity. Because of the absence of evidence of the validity of the diagnostic threshold for a categorical diagnosis of BPD, and because of the heterogeneity within the diagnosis, investigators should also supplement their DSM-IV diagnoses with assessments of underlying personality trait structures. Although there are a number of competing models of personality structure, they have remarkable convergence on a set of three to five basic personality dimensions.

摘要

边缘性人格障碍(BPD)是一种复杂且严重的精神障碍,与严重的功能损害、大量的治疗利用以及高自杀死亡率相关。最近,BPD已成为强化研究的焦点。在这篇分三部分的文章的第一部分中,旨在为研究人员提供关于边缘性诊断现状及其未来发展前景的基础,我们研究了BPD的精神病理学、共病情况和人格结构。尽管BPD的描述性特征在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)诊断标准中有很好的体现,但BPD精神病理学的其他重要方面并未包括在内。然而,描述性标准与半结构化访谈相结合,提高了研究人员像诊断许多轴I障碍一样可靠地诊断BPD的能力。BPD与轴I障碍的频繁共病需要对精神病理学进行广泛评估,以帮助解释临床异质性。由于缺乏BPD分类诊断阈值有效性的证据,并且由于诊断内部的异质性,研究人员还应用潜在人格特质结构的评估来补充他们的DSM-IV诊断。尽管有许多相互竞争的人格结构模型,但它们在一组三到五个基本人格维度上有显著的趋同性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验