• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

频率和语义相似性对形态加工的贡献。

The contribution of frequency and semantic similarity to morphological processing.

作者信息

Raveh Michal

机构信息

Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 2002 Apr-Jun;81(1-3):312-25. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2527.

DOI:10.1006/brln.2001.2527
PMID:12081402
Abstract

This research investigated the role of frequency and semantic factors in the processing of morphologically complex words. Unaffixed targets were immediately preceded by either inflected or derived primes that were either high or low in frequency. In Experiment 1, low-frequency inflections and derivations produced equivalent priming effects, whereas high-frequency inflections produced more priming than derivations. In Experiment 2, both semantic and morphological priming varied as a function of SOA (50, 150, and 250 ms). The difference in priming of inflections and derivations increased as SOA increased. Results suggest that frequency and semantic similarity interactively modulate the magnitude of morphological priming and, by inference, affect the processing of morphologically complex words. Dual-route and connectionist accounts are discussed.

摘要

本研究调查了频率和语义因素在形态复杂单词加工过程中的作用。未加词缀的目标词之前紧接着出现的是屈折变化或派生变化的启动词,这些启动词的频率有高有低。在实验1中,低频屈折变化和派生变化产生了同等的启动效应,而高频屈折变化产生的启动效应比派生变化更多。在实验2中,语义启动和形态启动均随刺激呈现间隔(50、150和250毫秒)而变化。随着刺激呈现间隔的增加,屈折变化和派生变化的启动差异增大。结果表明,频率和语义相似性交互调节形态启动的大小,并由此推断,影响形态复杂单词的加工。文中还讨论了双通道和联结主义的解释。

相似文献

1
The contribution of frequency and semantic similarity to morphological processing.频率和语义相似性对形态加工的贡献。
Brain Lang. 2002 Apr-Jun;81(1-3):312-25. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2527.
2
On the representation of inflections and derivations: data from Spanish.关于屈折变化和派生变化的表现形式:来自西班牙语的数据。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2003 Nov;32(6):621-68. doi: 10.1023/a:1026123315293.
3
Comparison of affective and semantic priming in different SOA.不同刺激呈现间隔下情感启动与语义启动的比较。
Cogn Process. 2016 Nov;17(4):357-375. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0771-8. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
4
Semantic aspects of morphological processing: transparency effects in Serbian.形态加工的语义方面:塞尔维亚语中的透明度效应
Mem Cognit. 2002 Jun;30(4):629-36. doi: 10.3758/bf03194964.
5
The locus of semantic priming effects in person recognition.人脸识别中语义启动效应的轨迹。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Oct;55(4):1141-56. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000189.
6
Co-occurrence frequency evaluated with large language corpora boosts semantic priming effects.通过大语言语料库评估的共现频率增强了语义启动效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Sep;70(9):1922-1934. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1215479. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
7
Processing differences across regular and irregular inflections revealed through ERPs.通过事件相关电位揭示的规则和不规则词形变化的加工差异。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Jun;41(3):747-60. doi: 10.1037/a0039150. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
8
Role of inflectional regularity and semantic transparency in reading morphologically complex words: evidence from acquired dyslexia.曲折规则性和语义透明度在阅读形态复杂单词中的作用:来自后天性阅读障碍的证据。
Neurocase. 2008;14(4):347-68. doi: 10.1080/13554790802368679.
9
Exploiting degrees of inflectional ambiguity: stem form and the time course of morphological processing.利用屈折歧义程度:词干形式与形态加工的时间进程。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jan;35(1):221-37. doi: 10.1037/a0014355.
10
Morphological priming: dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors.形态启动:语音、语义和形态因素的分离
Mem Cognit. 2000 Dec;28(8):1277-88. doi: 10.3758/bf03211828.

引用本文的文献

1
Sensorimotor distance: A grounded measure of semantic similarity for 800 million concept pairs.感觉运动距离:用于衡量 8 亿对概念对语义相似性的基础测度。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Oct;55(7):3416-3432. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01965-7. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
2
Asymmetric Morphological Priming Among Inflected and Derived Verbs and Nouns in Greek.希腊语中屈折动词和派生动词及名词之间的不对称形态启动效应
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 17;12:658189. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658189. eCollection 2021.
3
Opacity, Transparency, and Morphological Priming: A Study of Prefixed Verbs in Dutch.
不透明度、透明度与形态启动:一项关于荷兰语前缀动词的研究。
J Mem Lang. 2020 Feb;110. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2019.104055. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
4
How Linearity and Structural Complexity Interact and Affect the Recognition of Italian Derived Words.线性与结构复杂性如何相互作用并影响对意大利语派生词的识别。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Feb;46(1):175-200. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9427-1.
5
Are CORNER and BROTHER Morphologically Complex? Not in the Long Term.“CORNER”和“BROTHER”在形态上复杂吗?从长远来看并非如此。
Lang Cogn Process. 2008 Jan 1;23(7-8):972-1001. doi: 10.1080/01690960802211027. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
6
Morphological processing as we know it: an analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification.我们所熟知的形态加工:对视觉单词识别中形态效应的分析性综述。
Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 12;3:232. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232. eCollection 2012.
7
Dual-route processing of complex words: new fMRI evidence from derivational suffixation.复杂单词的双通道加工:来自派生词缀法的新功能磁共振成像证据
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2005 Mar;5(1):67-76. doi: 10.3758/cabn.5.1.67.
8
Graded aspects of morphological processing: task and processing time.形态学处理的分级方面:任务与处理时间
Brain Lang. 2002 Apr-Jun;81(1-3):12-27. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2503.