Sunshine Jonathan H, Lewis Rebecca S, Schepps Barbara, Forman Howard P
Research Department, American College of Radiology, 1891 Preston White Dr, Reston, VA 20191, USA.
Radiology. 2002 Jul;224(1):193-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2241011150.
To determine whether data from a professional society placement service--the Professional Bureau of the American College of Radiology--are a valid measure of the employment market.
For the United States from 1990 to 1998, the authors compared three placement service measures-the annual number of job listings, job seekers, and listings per seeker-with two presumably valid measures of the employment market-annual total jobs available (which was ascertained from surveys of hiring) and radiologist median income relative to the all-physician median. For the comparisons, both graphic displays of the data and correlation were used.
In graphs, patterns of change were similar. The correlation of job listings, which measure demand, with total jobs, which also measure demand, was 0.84 (P =.04). The correlation of (a) job seekers, a measure of supply, and (b) listings per seeker, which involve both supply and demand, with total jobs was substantial but lower: 0.58 (P =.23) and 0.76 (P =.08), respectively. Correlation of the three placement service measures with relative income, which presumably depends on both supply and demand, was 0.80-0.88 (P <.05 for each measure).
The statistical significance levels of the correlations and the pattern of findings--namely, stronger correlations among measures of the same aspect of the employment market--indicate that these placement service data are valid and reasonably accurate measures of the employment market.
确定来自专业协会安置服务机构——美国放射学会专业局的数据是否是就业市场的有效衡量指标。
作者对1990年至1998年美国的情况进行研究,将安置服务的三项指标——每年的职位列表数量、求职者数量以及每个求职者的职位列表数——与就业市场的两项据推测有效的指标进行比较,这两项指标分别是每年可获得的总职位数(通过招聘调查确定)以及放射科医生收入中位数相对于所有医生收入中位数的情况。在比较过程中,使用了数据的图表展示和相关性分析。
在图表中,变化模式相似。衡量需求的职位列表数量与同样衡量需求的总职位数之间的相关性为0.84(P = 0.04)。作为供应衡量指标的求职者数量以及涉及供需双方的每个求职者的职位列表数与总职位数之间的相关性显著但较低,分别为0.58(P = 0.23)和0.76(P = 0.08)。这三项安置服务指标与相对收入(据推测取决于供需双方)之间的相关性为0.80 - 0.88(每项指标的P < 0.05)。
相关性的统计显著性水平以及研究结果的模式——即就业市场同一方面的指标之间相关性更强——表明这些安置服务数据是就业市场的有效且相当准确的衡量指标。