Storrie Brian, Nilsson Tommy
Department of Biochemistry, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0308, USA.
Traffic. 2002 Aug;3(8):521-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2002.30802.x.
Most models put forward to explain cellular processes do not stand the test of time. The 'lucky' few that are able to survive extensive experimental tests and peer critique may eventually become dogmas or paradigms. When this happens, the amount of experimental data required to overturn the paradigm is extensive. To some, such inertia may seem prohibitive to scientific progress but rather, in our opinion, this helps to maintain a degree of coherence. It is needed so that experiments and interpretations may be conducted within relatively safe boundaries. In the field of protein transport in the secretory pathway, we have enjoyed a relatively stable and productive period for quite some time (more than 30 years!). It is only very recently that the field has entered into a phase where all bets seem to be off. As in any paradigm shift, the accumulation of experimental observations inconsistent with the old dogma eventually reached a critical point. As we 'reluctantly' dispense with the long-standing paradigm of forward vesicular transport, we face a time that is bound to be trying as well as exciting.
大多数用来解释细胞过程的模型都经不起时间的考验。少数“幸运”的模型能够经受住广泛的实验测试和同行批评,最终可能会成为教条或范式。当这种情况发生时,推翻该范式所需的实验数据量是巨大的。对一些人来说,这种惰性可能似乎阻碍了科学进步,但在我们看来,这有助于保持一定程度的连贯性。这是必要的,以便实验和解释可以在相对安全的范围内进行。在分泌途径中的蛋白质运输领域,我们已经有相当长一段时间(超过30年!)处于相对稳定和富有成果的时期。直到最近,该领域才进入一个似乎一切都不确定的阶段。与任何范式转变一样,与旧教条不一致的实验观察结果的积累最终达到了临界点。当我们“不情愿地”摒弃长期以来的正向囊泡运输范式时,我们面临的将是一个既充满挑战又令人兴奋的时期。