Tursi Antonio, Brandimarte Giovanni, Giorgetti GianMarco, Modeo Maria Ester, Gigliobianco Andrea
Division of Emergency, L. Bonomo Hospital, Andria, Italy.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Jul-Aug;49(46):1006-9.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ranitidine bismuth citrate has recently been introduced for the treatment of H. pylori infection and obtains good eradication rates; however, eradication failures still appear in a considerable proportion of cases. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus amoxycillin and clarithromycin as first- or second-line therapy to cure H. pylori infection.
We studied 423 consecutive H. pylori-positive patients. In 210 consecutive patients H. pylori infection was diagnosed for the first time (group A), while 213 consecutive patients were enrolled after failure of a first attempt to eradicate H. pylori (group B). All patients received ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. plus clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and amoxycillin 1 g b.d. for seven days. H. pylori-status was evaluated by means of histology and rapid urease test at entry and by 13C-urea breath test in all patients one month after treatment.
410/423 patients completed the study (202/210 in group A and 208/213 in group B). Two patients of group A and 1 patient of group B were withdrawn from the study due to poor compliance, 6 group A patients and 4 group B patients were lost to follow-up. In group A, after the end of treatment, 181/202 patients were H. pylori-negative (per-protocol analysis: 89.60% [C.I. 95%: 82-95%]; on intention-to-treat analysis: 86.19% [C.I. 95%; 76-92%]), side-effects occurred in 29 patients (13.80%); they were severe in 2 patients and the patients were withdrawn from the study. In group B, after the end of treatment, 200/208 patients were H. pylori-negative (per-protocol analysis: 95.15% [C.I. 95%; 92-100%], on intention-to-treat analysis: 93.89% [C.I. 95%; 89-98%), side-effects occurred in 11 patients (5.13%); they were slight or mild and did not require discontinuation of the treatment. The results of group B were statistically better than group A, both in eradication rate (P < 0.01) as well as both side-effects provoked (P < 0.01).
Ranitidine bismuth citrate-clarithromycin-amoxycillin is more effective when used as second-line therapy rather than when used as first-line therapy; second, ranitidine bismuth citrate-clarithromycin-amoxycillin shows lower and slighter side-effects when used as second-line therapy rather than when used as first-line therapy; finally, the excellent tolerability of ranitidine bismuth citrate + clarithromycin + amoxycillin influences positively the patients' compliance, both as first- and second-line therapy.
背景/目的:枸橼酸铋雷尼替丁最近被用于治疗幽门螺杆菌感染,并取得了良好的根除率;然而,在相当一部分病例中仍会出现根除失败的情况。本研究的目的是比较枸橼酸铋雷尼替丁联合阿莫西林和克拉霉素作为一线或二线疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的疗效和耐受性。
我们研究了423例连续的幽门螺杆菌阳性患者。在210例连续患者中,首次诊断出幽门螺杆菌感染(A组),而213例连续患者是在首次根除幽门螺杆菌尝试失败后入组的(B组)。所有患者接受枸橼酸铋雷尼替丁400mg,每日2次,加克拉霉素500mg,每日2次,阿莫西林1g,每日2次,共7天。在入组时通过组织学和快速尿素酶试验评估幽门螺杆菌状态,并在治疗1个月后对所有患者进行13C尿素呼气试验。
410/423例患者完成了研究(A组202/210例,B组208/213例)。A组2例患者和B组1例患者因依从性差退出研究,A组6例患者和B组4例患者失访。在A组,治疗结束后,181/202例患者幽门螺杆菌阴性(符合方案分析:89.60%[95%置信区间:82-95%];意向性分析:86.19%[95%置信区间;76-92%]),29例患者出现副作用(13.80%);2例患者副作用严重并退出研究。在B组,治疗结束后,200/208例患者幽门螺杆菌阴性(符合方案分析:95.15%[95%置信区间;92-100%],意向性分析:93.89%[95%置信区间;89-98%]),11例患者出现副作用(5.13%);副作用轻微或中度,无需中断治疗。B组的结果在根除率(P<0.01)以及引发的副作用方面(P<0.01)均在统计学上优于A组。
枸橼酸铋雷尼替丁-克拉霉素-阿莫西林作为二线疗法使用时比作为一线疗法更有效;其次,枸橼酸铋雷尼替丁-克拉霉素-阿莫西林作为二线疗法使用时比作为一线疗法显示出更低、更轻微的副作用;最后,枸橼酸铋雷尼替丁+克拉霉素+阿莫西林的出色耐受性对患者作为一线和二线疗法的依从性有积极影响。