Suppr超能文献

使用二氧化碳气腹法减轻结肠镜检查后腹痛:一项评估新型商用二氧化碳输送系统的前瞻性、随机、双盲对照试验。

Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO(2) insufflation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO(2) delivery system.

作者信息

Sumanac Katica, Zealley Ian, Fox Bruce M, Rawlinson John, Salena Bruno, Marshall John K, Stevenson Giles W, Hunt Richard H

机构信息

McMaster University Medical Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Aug;56(2):190-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(02)70176-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abdominal pain after colonoscopy is a common, distressing symptom resulting from bowel distension by insufflated gas. CO(2), unlike air, is rapidly cleared from the colon by passive absorption. A commercially available CO(2) delivery system has only recently become available. The effects of CO(2) and air insufflation on residual bowel gas and postprocedure pain were compared.

METHODS

One hundred patients were randomized to undergo colonoscopy with insufflation of air (n = 51) or CO(2) (n = 49) by means of a regulator; 97 patients completed the study. Patients with active GI bleeding, inflammatory bowel disease, or previous colectomy were excluded. Pain scores (ordinal scale: 0 = none, to 5 = extreme) were recorded immediately after colonoscopy and at 1, 6, and 24 hours. Residual colonic gas was evaluated on abdominal radiographs at 1 hour.

RESULTS

Residual colonic gas and postprocedural pain at 1 and 6 hours were significantly less in the CO(2) group. 71% of patients insufflated with room air had colonic distension in excess of 6 cm versus 4% for those in the CO(2) group. 94% of patients insufflated with CO(2) had minimal colonic gas versus 2% in whom air was used (p < 0.0001). Of patients insufflated with air, 45% and 31% had pain at, respectively, 1 hour and 6 hours, versus 7% and 9%, respectively, for those insufflated with CO(2) (respectively, p < 0.0001 and p < O.02). No complications resulted from use of the CO(2) delivery system.

CONCLUSIONS

Insufflation of CO(2) rather than air significantly reduces abdominal pain and bowel distension after colonoscopy. CO(2) may be insufflated safely and effectively with the new CO(2) delivery system.

摘要

背景

结肠镜检查后腹痛是一种常见的、令人痛苦的症状,由注入气体导致肠扩张引起。与空气不同,二氧化碳可通过被动吸收迅速从结肠清除。一种市售的二氧化碳输送系统直到最近才出现。比较了二氧化碳和空气注入对残留肠气及术后疼痛的影响。

方法

100例患者通过调节器随机接受空气注入(n = 51)或二氧化碳注入(n = 49)的结肠镜检查;97例患者完成了研究。排除有活动性胃肠道出血、炎症性肠病或既往结肠切除术的患者。在结肠镜检查后即刻以及1、6和24小时记录疼痛评分(序数量表:0 = 无,至5 = 极痛)。在1小时时通过腹部X线片评估残留结肠气体。

结果

二氧化碳组在1小时和6小时时的残留结肠气体及术后疼痛明显较少。注入空气的患者中有71%结肠扩张超过6 cm,而二氧化碳组为4%。注入二氧化碳的患者中有94%结肠气体极少,而使用空气的患者中这一比例为2%(p < 0.0001)。注入空气的患者中,分别有45%和31%在1小时和6小时时出现疼痛,而注入二氧化碳的患者中这一比例分别为7%和9%(分别为p < 0.0001和p < 0.02)。使用二氧化碳输送系统未导致并发症。

结论

注入二氧化碳而非空气可显著减轻结肠镜检查后的腹痛和肠扩张。使用新的二氧化碳输送系统可安全有效地注入二氧化碳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验