Lumb E M, McHardy G J, Kay A B
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979 Jul;8(1):65-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1979.tb05911.x.
Sodium nivimedone (BRL 10833) which acts similarly to disodium cromoglycate (DSCG), given at an oral dose of 200 mg thrice daily, was compared, after a preliminary standardization week, with placebo in a 6-week double-blind cross-over trial. Twenty-four non-smoking, atopic, asthmatic out-patients aged between 16 and 32 years, who were not taking corticosteroids took part. Subjects recorded symptoms and bronchodilator use each day and measured peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) thrice daily. Data was analysed separately for the twelve subjects who received placebo followed by sodium nivimedone (Group I) and those who took the treatments in the reverse order (Group II). In Group I subjects, with sodium nivimedone, bronchodilator use decreased, symptom scores improved and there was a significant improvement in overall PEFR as well as the separated morning and evening values. When symptom scores were expressed as a percentage of the placebo disability index, wheezing, chest tightness, cough and asthma on activity showed significant improvement. Subjects in Group II showed no improvement in any of these variables when drug was compared to placebo. Sodium nivimedone did not appear to have any effect on circulating eosinophil levels, and concentrations of serum IgE, C3 and C4. There was no clinical or laboratory evidence that sodium nivimedone had any untoward effect in the doses given. Sodium nivimedone appeared to be of benefit in the subjects studied. The importance of appreciating the order of treatments and the value of frequent serial objective and subjective measures of disability backed up by appropriate data processing is stressed.
口服剂量为每日三次、每次200毫克的奈维美酮钠(BRL 10833),其作用与色甘酸二钠(DSCG)相似。在经过为期一周的初步标准化治疗后,在一项为期6周的双盲交叉试验中,将其与安慰剂进行了比较。24名年龄在16至32岁之间、不吸烟、患有特应性哮喘的门诊患者参与了试验,这些患者未服用皮质类固醇药物。受试者每天记录症状和支气管扩张剂的使用情况,并每日三次测量呼气峰值流速(PEFR)。分别对先接受安慰剂后接受奈维美酮钠治疗的12名受试者(第一组)和接受治疗顺序相反的受试者(第二组)的数据进行了分析。在第一组受试者中,使用奈维美酮钠后,支气管扩张剂的使用减少,症状评分改善,总体PEFR以及分开的早晨和晚上的值均有显著改善。当将症状评分表示为安慰剂残疾指数的百分比时,喘息、胸闷、咳嗽和活动时的哮喘症状均有显著改善。与安慰剂相比,第二组受试者在这些变量中均未出现改善。奈维美酮钠似乎对循环嗜酸性粒细胞水平以及血清IgE、C3和C4的浓度没有任何影响。没有临床或实验室证据表明奈维美酮钠在所用剂量下有任何不良影响。奈维美酮钠似乎对所研究的受试者有益。强调了了解治疗顺序的重要性以及通过适当的数据处理对残疾情况进行频繁的系列客观和主观测量的价值。