Scanlon Kelley S, Alexander Maria P, Serdula Mary K, Davis Margarett K, Bowman Barbara A
Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3714, USA.
Nutr Rev. 2002 Aug;60(8):235-51. doi: 10.1301/002966402320289368.
Accurate assessment of infant feeding is needed for clinical practice and research. We identified 32 studies that evaluated the validity of direct observation, test weighing, or doubly labeled water methods. Correlations with validation standards were highest for doubly labeled water and test weighing, and lowest for observation. Cost and availability of isotope may limit the doubly labeled water method to research studies, whereas observation may be useful for clinical practice. Test weighing could be applied to either setting, but it may be practical to sample less frequently over 24 hours. Validity results and intended use of the measurement should be considered when selecting a method.
临床实践和研究需要对婴儿喂养进行准确评估。我们确定了32项评估直接观察法、称重法或双标水法有效性的研究。双标水法和称重法与验证标准的相关性最高,观察法的相关性最低。同位素的成本和可获得性可能会使双标水法仅限于研究使用,而观察法可能对临床实践有用。称重法可应用于任何一种情况,但在24小时内减少采样频率可能更实际。选择方法时应考虑有效性结果和测量的预期用途。