Kahana Michael J, Sekuler Robert
Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA.
Vision Res. 2002 Aug;42(18):2177-192. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00118-9.
Models of categorization typically rely on the use of stimuli composed of well-defined dimensions (e.g., Ashby & Maddox (1998) in Choice, decision, and measurement: Essays in honor of R. Duncan Luce, p. 251-301, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum). We apply a similar approach to the analysis of recognition memory. Using a version of short-term recognition paradigm (Sternberg, Science 153 (1966) 652), we asked whether NEMO Sternberg's, a noisy exemplar summed-similarity model, could account for variation in mean performance on individual trials. NEMO provided a very good overall fit to recognition data from three experiments. However, its failure to fit data for certain lists of stimuli suggested a revision of the summed-similarity assumption. Our model-based analysis showed that subjects used interitem similarity, in addition to probe-item similarity, as the basis for their decisions. This represents a major departure from existing recognition models that assume subjects' judgments depend exclusively on the summed similarity of the probe to the study items.
分类模型通常依赖于使用由明确界定的维度组成的刺激物(例如,阿什比和马多克斯(1998年),载于《选择、决策与测量:纪念R.邓肯·卢斯论文集》,第251 - 301页,新泽西州马哈瓦:埃尔拉姆巴姆出版社)。我们将类似的方法应用于识别记忆的分析。使用短期识别范式的一个版本(斯滕伯格,《科学》153卷(1966年)第652页),我们询问了NEMO(斯滕伯格的一个有噪声范例求和相似性模型)是否能够解释个体试验中平均表现的变化。NEMO对来自三个实验的识别数据提供了非常好的整体拟合。然而,它未能拟合某些刺激物列表的数据,这表明需要对求和相似性假设进行修正。我们基于模型的分析表明,除了探测项目相似性之外,受试者还使用项目间相似性作为其决策的基础。这与现有的识别模型有很大不同,现有模型假设受试者的判断完全取决于探测项目与学习项目的求和相似性。