Youn Sang Woong, Kim Soo Jung, Hwang In A, Park Kyoung Chan
Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, 28 Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea.
Skin Res Technol. 2002 Aug;8(3):168-72. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0846.2002.10320.x.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Facial skin is usually classified as dry, normal, and oily in the cosmetics field. However, there is no standard objective method for classifying facial skin.
We measured sebum excretion with Sebumeter at four sites on the face. Based on the amount of sebum secretion, we reclassified skin type according to the guidelines provided by the manufacturer. The mean of sebum excretion (mean facial sebum excretion; MFSE) was also calculated.
People secrete varying amounts of sebum at different skin sites. Reclassification of skin type based on sebum secretion revealed that most participants underestimated the amount of facial sebum excretion. When sebum secretion amounts were compared, a statistically significant difference was apparent between the oily and dry skin types. However, there were no statistical differences between oily and normal, and normal and dry skin.
We showed that subjective skin type does not match the amount of sebum secreted. Thus, this simple and subjective classification is of very limited use and it should be re-evaluated by using an objective and standardized measuring tool.
背景/目的:在化妆品领域,面部皮肤通常分为干性、中性和油性。然而,目前尚无用于面部皮肤分类的标准客观方法。
我们使用皮脂仪在面部四个部位测量皮脂分泌量。根据皮脂分泌量,我们按照制造商提供的指南重新分类皮肤类型。同时还计算了皮脂分泌的平均值(平均面部皮脂分泌量;MFSE)。
人们在不同皮肤部位分泌的皮脂量各不相同。基于皮脂分泌的皮肤类型重新分类显示,大多数参与者低估了面部皮脂分泌量。比较皮脂分泌量时,油性和干性皮肤类型之间存在统计学上的显著差异。然而,油性与中性、中性与干性皮肤之间没有统计学差异。
我们发现主观的皮肤类型与皮脂分泌量不相符。因此,这种简单的主观分类用途非常有限,应该使用客观和标准化的测量工具进行重新评估。