Hunter A M, St Clair Gibson A, Mbambo Z, Lambert M I, Noakes T D
Department of Sports Studies, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland.
Pflugers Arch. 2002 Sep;444(6):738-43. doi: 10.1007/s00424-002-0841-x. Epub 2002 Aug 9.
This study analysed the effect of hot (35 degrees C) and cold (15 degrees C) environments on electromyographic (EMG) signal characteristics, skin and rectal temperatures and heart rate during progressive endurance exercise. Eight healthy subjects performed three successive 15-min rides at 30%, 50% and 70% of their peak sustained power output and then cycled at increasing (15 W/min) work rates to exhaustion in both 35 degrees C and 15 degrees C environments. Skin and rectal temperatures, heart rate and EMG data were measured during the trials. The skin temperatures were higher and the subjects felt more uncomfortable in the hot conditions (Bedford scale) ( P<0.01). Rectal temperature was slightly, but not significantly, higher under hot conditions. Heart rate was significantly higher in the hot group (between condition P<0.05). Peak power output (267.4+/-67.7 W vs. 250.1+/-61.5 W) and time-to-exhaustion (55.7+/-16.7 min vs. 54.5+/-17.1 min) (COLD vs. HOT) were not different between conditions. There were no differences in integrated EMG (IEMG) or mean power frequency spectrum between conditions. Rating of perceived exertion increased similarly in both conditions over time. Although the hot conditions increased heart rate and skin temperature, there were no differences in muscle recruitment or maximal performance, which suggests that the thermal stress of 35 degrees C, in combination with exercise, did not impair maximal performance in this study.
本研究分析了在进行递增耐力运动期间,热环境(35摄氏度)和冷环境(15摄氏度)对肌电图(EMG)信号特征、皮肤温度、直肠温度和心率的影响。八名健康受试者在相当于其峰值持续功率输出的30%、50%和70%的强度下,依次进行三次15分钟的骑行,然后在35摄氏度和15摄氏度环境中,以递增(15瓦/分钟)的工作强度骑行至力竭。在试验过程中测量皮肤温度、直肠温度、心率和EMG数据。热环境下皮肤温度更高,受试者感觉更不舒服(贝德福德量表)(P<0.01)。热环境下直肠温度略高,但无显著差异。热环境组的心率显著更高(不同环境间P<0.05)。不同环境间的峰值功率输出(267.4±67.7瓦对250.1±61.5瓦)和力竭时间(55.7±16.7分钟对54.5±17.1分钟)(冷环境对热环境)没有差异。不同环境间的积分肌电图(IEMG)或平均功率频谱没有差异。随着时间推移,两种环境下的主观用力感觉评分增加情况相似。尽管热环境会增加心率和皮肤温度,但在肌肉募集或最大运动表现方面没有差异,这表明在本研究中,35摄氏度的热应激与运动相结合,并未损害最大运动表现。