Crisostomo Lenore, Molina Victorio V
Department of Health, College of Health, University of the Philippines, Ermita, Manila.
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2002 Jul-Sep;8(3):232-42. doi: 10.1179/107735202800338812.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare pregnancy outcomes in farming households that used pesticides conventionally with those that practiced integrated pest management (IPM) in Nueva Ecija, Philippines, in the period 1998-1999. Conventional pesticide users (CPUs) were defined as pesticide appliers who used pesticides routinely and regularly, whereas users of IPM were those who used pesticides as necessary, and on economically injured crop areas only. The data sets were subjected to the chi-square test of association, Fisher's exact probability test, and logistic regression analysis. At a significance level at 0.05, spontaneous abortion occurred significantly more often among the 345 CPU households than among the 331 IPM households (adjusted risk ratio 6.17). Likewise, birth defects were significantly more common in the CPU group (adjusted risk ratio 4.56). Thus, people of reproductive age who plan to have children should avoid any use of pesticides.
1998年至1999年期间,在菲律宾新怡诗夏省开展了一项回顾性队列研究,以比较常规使用农药的农户与采用病虫害综合防治(IPM)的农户的妊娠结局。常规农药使用者(CPU)被定义为定期且常规使用农药的施药者,而IPM使用者是仅在经济受损的作物区域根据需要使用农药的人。数据集进行了关联的卡方检验、费舍尔精确概率检验和逻辑回归分析。在0.05的显著性水平下,345个CPU家庭中自然流产的发生率显著高于331个IPM家庭(调整风险比6.17)。同样,出生缺陷在CPU组中也显著更常见(调整风险比4.56)。因此,计划生育的育龄人群应避免使用任何农药。