Caponas G
Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002 Oct;30(5):551-69. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0203000503.
The Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) was introduced into clinical practice in 1997 following numerous clinical trials involving 1110 patients. The success rate of blind intubation via the device after two attempts is 88% in "routine" cases. Successful intubation in a variety of difficult airway scenarios, including awake intubation, has been described, with the overall success rate in the 377 patients reported being approximately 98%. The use of the ILMA by the novice operator has also been investigated with conflicting reports as to its suitability for emergency intubation in this setting. Blind versus visualized intubation techniques have also been investigated. These techniques may provide some benefits in improved safety and success rates, although the evidence is not definitive. The use of a visualizing technique is recommended, especially whilst experience with intubation via the ILMA is being gained. The risk of oesophageal intubation is reported as 5% and one death has been described secondary to the complications of oesophageal perforation during blind intubation. Morbidity described with the use of the ILMA includes sore throat, hoarse voice and epiglottic oedema. Haemodynamic changes associated with intubation via the ILMA are of minimal clinical consequence. The ILMA is a valuable adjunct to the airway management armamentarium, especially in cases of difficult airway management. Success with the device is more likely if the head of the patient is maintained in the neutral position, when the operator has practised at least 20 previous insertions and when the accompanying lubricated armoured tube is used.
气管插管型喉罩气道(ILMA)在1997年引入临床实践,此前进行了涉及1110名患者的大量临床试验。在“常规”病例中,经该装置两次尝试后盲探插管的成功率为88%。已有文献报道在包括清醒插管在内的各种困难气道情况下成功插管,据报道377例患者的总体成功率约为98%。也对新手操作者使用ILMA进行了研究,但关于其在此种情况下用于紧急插管的适用性报告不一。还对盲探与可视插管技术进行了研究。这些技术可能在提高安全性和成功率方面有一些益处,尽管证据并不确凿。建议使用可视技术,尤其是在积累通过ILMA插管经验的过程中。据报道食管插管的风险为5%,有1例死亡是由于盲探插管期间食管穿孔并发症所致。使用ILMA所描述的并发症包括咽痛、声音嘶哑和声门上水肿。通过ILMA插管相关的血流动力学变化临床意义极小。ILMA是气道管理器械库中的一种有价值的辅助工具,尤其是在困难气道管理的病例中。如果患者头部保持在中立位、操作者此前至少已进行过20次插入操作且使用配套的润滑金属导管,则使用该装置更有可能成功。